By Months: Alar Laneman

The style is twofold: one speaker is formal and procedural, focusing on legislative reporting and linguistic clarifications of the draft bill. The second speaker is direct and argumentative, employing rhetoric to refute objections and emphasizing the importance of strategic depth and time urgency. Speaker 2 also uses vernacular language and references the desire for "fewer words, longer step," yet still actively intervenes in the debate.

The style is highly formal, factual, and procedural, making it suitable for a parliamentary presentation. The tone is measured and serious, focusing on facts, the legislative process, and the strategic context (e.g., a reference to the history of warfare). Emotional appeals are absent; the emphasis is placed on logic and detail.

The rhetorical style is formal, serious, and pressing, stressing that "special times require special decisions" and calling for courage from decision-makers. The speaker balances emotional references (the tragic backdrop of history) with logical arguments, employing metaphors ("The gun is not to blame; the person who pulls the trigger is") while underscoring accountability.

The rhetorical style is formal and respectful, acknowledging the minister's calm and substantive style of response. At the same time, the style is critical of the quality of the parliamentary debate, warning against it becoming "ridiculous" or "odd." Conceptual metaphors are used, such as the "system of communicating vessels."