By Months: Alar Laneman

The opposition is aimed at colleagues who question the constitutionality of the draft bill or comment on the behavior of other parliamentarians (head shaking). Speaker 2 refutes the notion that a company-sized unit holds significant military importance and criticizes the short-sightedness evident in security planning. The criticism is directed at political viewpoints and procedural conduct, not at a personal level.

There is no direct confrontation. The speaker merely contextualizes the findings of the National Audit Office, prioritizing warfighting capability over accounting details, but acknowledges the existence of problems and the ministry's work in resolving them.

The direct criticism is aimed at the eastern neighbor (the aggressor state), which uses landmines in the aggressive war in Ukraine, despite international agreements. Indirectly, the criticism targets those who oppose the use of landmines under the banner of a "fight for peace," suggesting they harbor a hidden political agenda.

The criticism is aimed at the low quality of the parliamentary debate, which threatens to turn the issue into a "laughing stock." It is also hinted that some of the colleagues' questions were not "well-intentioned," but direct opponents or political groupings are not named.