By Plenary Sessions: Alar Laneman

The rhetorical style is highly formal, informative, and procedural, making it suitable for introducing the draft bill to the plenary session. The tone is neutral and professional, focusing on logical arguments (alliance obligations) and summarizing the committee's work. Emotional or personal appeals are absent; the emphasis is placed solely on facts and describing the procedure.

The style is analytical, factual, and contextualizing, employing a historical argument to underscore the priority of military readiness over bureaucracy. The tone is serious and constructive, while simultaneously voicing concern over a strategic gap. The address concludes with a direct and pointed question regarding future plans.

The rhetorical style is formal and direct, presenting a question to the session chair for clarification. A logical appeal is used, referencing the previously given answer ("There are no strikes in the Riigikogu") and the observed events (taking a recess). The tone is demanding and inquisitive.