By Agendas: Alar Laneman

The speaker demonstrates expertise in the field of international military operations, the security situation, and national defense. Specific terminology is utilized (EUNAVFOR Med/Irini, UN arms embargo, satellite capabilities), and reference is made to briefings provided by Defense Forces specialists (colonels). The expertise encompasses both the objectives of the operation and the legislative procedure.

Demonstrates expertise in the national defense sector, particularly concerning military capability, logistics, and audits conducted by the National Audit Office. Employs specific terminology and contextualizes accounting deficiencies within the broader framework of military readiness.

Expertise is demonstrated through knowledge of the parliament's rules of procedure and procedural matters, particularly concerning the presiding officer's decisions regarding the taking of recesses and the definition of the protests (strikes) that occurred in the Riigikogu. The speaker emphasizes the need to formally establish the official designation of the event that took place.

The speaker demonstrates expertise regarding national defense and the responsible deployment of weapon systems, drawing a distinction between the nature of the instrument and the responsibility of the user. Reference is made to the planning-based culture, documentation, and designated areas within the Defense Forces that ensure responsible usage. Furthermore, the ineffectiveness of the convention is analyzed, citing the proliferation of improvised explosive devices (IEDs) as a key example.

Expertise is evident in the application of social and societal models (e.g., the "system of communicating vessels") within political discourse. Specific knowledge regarding amendments to the Securities Market Act is lacking; the focus is instead on issues of inclusion and the utilization of human potential. He/She emphasizes procedural awareness, seeking advice on how to prevent the discussion from descending into farce.

The speaker demonstrates deep expertise regarding the history and evolution of Estonian peacekeeping operations, tracing them from the initial section within the Defence Forces General Staff right up to the present day. He emphasizes the role these missions play in developing defense capabilities, specifically citing the language environment, staff procedures, and the building of national competence in strategic planning.

The speaker demonstrates competence regarding the procedural rules and schedule of the Riigikogu, citing specific sections of the law and committee decisions. Specific knowledge relates to the name of Operation EUNAVFOR Med/Irini and the associated costs, which total slightly over 28,000 euros. However, the speaker acknowledges that the committee did not take a broad view during the discussion, limiting itself strictly to its mandate.

The speaker demonstrates thorough knowledge of international military operations, including the specific objectives of EUNAVFOR Med/Irini. This expertise covers the implementation of the UN arms embargo on Libya, the prevention of illegal oil exports, and the training of the Libyan Navy. Specific details are used, such as the reduction of personnel from six to three and the utilization of air and satellite capabilities in the operation.

The speaker demonstrates knowledge regarding the intersection of regional policy and national defense planning, clearly distinguishing between regional and agricultural aspects. He/She employs concepts such as synergy and the management of autonomous sectors. The expertise is based on citing specific regional cases (Nursipalu, Pärnu) as examples of the neglect of regional considerations.

The speaker demonstrates expertise on issues of internal security, crisis reserves, and population preparedness. Particular emphasis is placed on the concept of comprehensive national defense, and specific attack forecasts made by the Commander of the Defense Forces are referenced (in two, three, or five years), which indicates knowledge of the highest level of security planning.

The speaker demonstrates expertise in the field of national defense, referencing specific topics such as air defense, allied relations, and ordnance procurement. He/She is well-versed in the complexity of drafting strategic plans and is able to link them with future forecasts. Furthermore, the speaker is aware of the public debates circulating in the media regarding NATO's role and defense acquisitions.

The speaker demonstrates expertise in the field of national defense and security, utilizing the specific term "hybrid warfare" and analyzing its danger in undermining democratic processes. This competence focuses on systemic impact, directly linking the credibility of elections with national defense issues.

The speaker demonstrates expertise in the field of education, focusing on the role of the Estonian language and culture, as well as the practical aspects of schooling. Particular emphasis is placed on concerns regarding the qualifications of educators and the student-to-teacher ratio in schools. This knowledge is utilized to criticize the shortcomings in the implementation of the minister's policy.

The assessment focuses on analyzing the social and political consequences, particularly concerning the timing of legislative decisions and their effect on the attitudes of religious communities. The speaker demonstrates awareness of the potential reaction of church members and believers to the state's actions. Procedural information is also requested regarding the planning process for drafting the statement.

The speaker demonstrates knowledge of the social and legal role of promises, citing marriage and business transactions as examples, and describing a promise as an instrument that binds society together. He/She also shows an understanding of how the economic environment is shaped, underscoring that the government designs the conditions (for instance, through taxation), which means they do not change spontaneously or independently.

The speaker demonstrates expertise on the topic of state fees and cost-based accounting, highlighting the lack of correlation between budgeted fixed costs (salaries, electricity) and the number of procedures performed. He/She is able to distinguish between the necessities of government functioning and the provision of benefits.

The speaker demonstrates expertise regarding election procedures and security, criticizing the subjectivity involved in handling proposed amendments (specifically citing the "insincere" criterion). They draw analogies to quality control requirements (comparing elections to items like an oven or furniture), stressing that the state is responsible for ensuring the process is tamper-proof and maintains integrity. A specific data point is also cited: that 40% of voters do not trust e-voting.

The speaker demonstrates competence in the field of sports policy, distinguishing between issues of living environment and behavior and those related to high-performance sport. They utilize specific terminology ("high-performance sport," "sports federations") and emphasize the social impact of high-performance sport through role models.

The speaker demonstrates expertise in strategic planning for national defense and resource allocation, specifically mentioning deficiencies in the procurement of shells and the slow pace of aid to Ukraine. They also possess knowledge regarding paradigm shifts in NATO defense planning and the necessity of updating allies' attitudes. Furthermore, the speaker highlights the neglect of non-military aspects, such as the construction of shelters and border zones.

The speaker demonstrates profound expertise in national defense planning, military capabilities, and the logistics of crisis management, stressing the necessity of an organized, equipped, and armed structure. Technical terms such as "capability development" are used, and examples (the Hamas attack in Israel, armored off-road vehicles) are provided, demonstrating an understanding of the operational situation. It is emphasized that resolving a crisis requires a single leading authority, rather than transferring command during the rapid progression of events.

The speaker demonstrates profound knowledge of defense planning, threat assessments, and the development of military capabilities, utilizing specific terminology such as "the capabilities development race." He relies on authoritative sources and institutions, including assessments from the prime minister, the commander of the defense forces, and US think tanks, to justify the urgency of preparedness. A distinct emphasis is placed on the difference between the long-term growth of economic and military capability and the short-term build-up of force groupings.

The speaker demonstrates expertise in the field of tax policy, focusing on the VAT rate and proposing a specific, non-standard percentage (19.4). However, more detailed economic justifications or the use of technical data to support the proposal are absent.

The speaker demonstrates knowledge of the comprehensive approach to national defense, highlighting its non-military aspects and their interconnectedness with other sectors. Furthermore, he/she focuses on procedural questions of legislation, calling for criteria to assess the fast-tracking of draft bills.