By Months: Hanah Lahe
Total Months: 9
Fully Profiled: 9
12.2024
2 Speeches
Insufficient data.
11.2024
5 Speeches
Strong opposition is directed at climate change deniers, or "non-believers," in parliament, who are accused of ignoring science and injecting misinformation into the electorate. The criticism is intense and personal, linking the opponents' activities to a direct security threat and the hindering of the country's development. Colleague Anti Poolamets is mentioned by name for mocking climate anxiety.
10.2024
2 Speeches
Significant opposition has been directed at the initiator of the draft legislation (Kalle Grünthal) and his proposal. He is being criticized for the lack of comprehensive answers and insufficient justification regarding the necessity of the bill. The opposition is based on policy and procedure, which resulted in the committee making a consensus recommendation to reject the draft legislation.
09.2024
6 Speeches
The criticism is aimed at the political parties in the Riigikogu who deny the reality of climate change or do not consider it a threat, thereby obstructing substantive and dignified debate. This criticism is based on policy and values, emphasizing that such denial is irresponsible.
05.2024
6 Speeches
The opposition stance is primarily directed at EKRE, criticizing their scientifically unfounded and contradictory claims regarding the causes of climate change (cosmic radiation, volcanoes). In the debate over youth voting rights, conservative arguments concerning the immaturity, low activity, and liberal leaning of young people are systematically refuted. The criticism is policy- and fact-based, not personal, even though Urmas Reinsalu's specific views were directly inquired about.
04.2024
1 Speeches
There is not enough data.
03.2024
2 Speeches
There is no opposition. Criticism is aimed rather at general unsustainable consumption trends (overconsumption, land drainage) and the unequal distribution of water resources globally.
02.2024
3 Speeches
A strong backlash is aimed at political opponents who are spreading misinformation on social media about a colleague (Karmen Joller), claiming that she recommends eating insects. The criticism is personal and ethical, and it is being amplified by references to a previous court battle with EKRE and the threat of a new summons.
01.2024
13 Speeches
The main opponents are the sponsors of the draft legislation, who introduce unscientific or inadequately prepared amendments. The criticism targets both the substance (lack of sources, plagiarism) and the procedure (failure to coordinate the invitation of guests). The politician stresses that belief has no place in the legislative process.