By Plenary Sessions: Lauri Laats

Formal, fact-based, and structured in the form of a modern parliamentary question; the tone is critical, but not emotional; it uses specific data and adopts a stylistically sensible, argument-supporting approach.

A critical yet constructive tone; it combines emotional emphasis regarding social problems with the use of facts and data. It addresses the Prime Minister directly, presenting a question and a proposal while stressing viable solutions. The speech is formal, argumentative, and focused on presenting clear nuances.

A formal and respectful tone; uses a direct, interrogative form, and focuses on facts and official addresses.

The speech is critical and, at times, aggressive. It uses emotional examples (such as problems with ambulance and rescue access), and poses questions and direct challenges to the government. Alongside factual examples, the speaker employs rhetorical questions and counterarguments, and occasionally synthesizes transitions, moving the discussion from the purely argumentative level to a more narrative or conversational tone.

The tone is formal, measured, and interrogative; it utilizes precise figures and references to pose a question and verify facts, rather than emphasizing emotionality.