By Plenary Sessions: Lauri Laats

Highlights potential financial gain (customers could save money); maintains a critical attitude toward the considerations of the government that adopted tax increases; focuses on the social economy and customer benefits as a priority.

Emphasizing the impact of energy costs and the economic inequality between Narva and other regions. It highlights the role of fluctuations in the price of CO2 quotas and calls for additional revenue to be directed toward mitigating heating costs in Narva, which demonstrates selective, regionally targeted implementation in economic policy.

Insufficient data.

The policy makes a clear distinction: opposing the car tax while supporting the bank tax. The goal is to find additional revenue streams to avoid placing a burden on ordinary citizens. The text indicates that tax changes have reduced the revenue base, making local municipalities dependent on the state budget. It emphasizes the necessity of increasing infrastructure funding and utilizes the balancing of national and local resources to improve fiscal dynamics.

He is critical of proposed tax hikes, highlighting the underlying nature of inflation and the potential rise in consumer prices. He calls for a thorough impact analysis and transparency, and refuses to support any tax increase without clear numerical justification.