By Plenary Sessions: Lauri Laats

The criticism is aimed at the current government and its market-based policy concerning support for producers; it stresses the need for state intervention. The second part opposes the idea of the car tax and presents three proposals—demonstrating strong resistance to specific tax points while emphasizing the protection of the economy and consumers. The intensity is strong and unmasked; a compromise and open discussion are sought, but there is no indication of a willingness to abandon the core objectives.

The main point of contention is the government’s economic policy and its handling of the demographic crisis: criticisms regarding tax increases and the cost of living, an inadequate plan, and the insufficient provision of answers. He/She opposes the current measures and does not see sufficiently concrete steps. Support directed towards Ukraine has been amplified, but we must proceed cautiously and in a controlled manner when dealing with the economic impacts.

At the heart of the criticism are the economic cost of the green transition and the energy market's impact on consumers. The claim by the head of the Belgian central bank that "the green transition will not make us richer," along with the National Audit Office's assessment that there is no clear vision or plan for the energy economy, are presented as significant objections. The criticism is being raised by various parties, and while the debate is viewed as necessary, there is simultaneous emphasis on the need to find a balance that does not undermine competitiveness or consumer interests. The intensity is high, but the criticism is framed as part of a democratic discussion.

Critical of the government’s tax policy, the speaker highlights the rising cost of living and increasing poverty, directly accusing the current coalition of imposing new taxes. They express criticism regarding both consumption taxes and future tax arrangements, while also challenging false predictions and the consequences of earlier decisions. Furthermore, they put forward proposals and examples illustrating the need for change, but make it clear that an easy compromise with the government is unlikely.