By Plenary Sessions: Kalle Laanet

The style is formal and defensively analytical, using personal experience as a platform for presenting criticism of legal policy shortcomings. The speaker balances the emphasis on their innocence with logical arguments against the ambiguity of the law and the actions of the prosecutor's office, directly addressing colleagues. The tone is critical towards state bodies that prosecute people "into poverty or death."

The rhetorical style is extremely formal, neutral, and procedural, focusing on the detailed presentation of draft amendments and committee decisions. Logical and technical language is employed, avoiding emotional appeals, which is typical for the rapporteur of the leading committee. The presentation is clear and structured, strictly adhering to the numbering and justifications of the legislative amendments.