By Plenary Sessions: Leo Kunnas

The speaker demonstrates expertise regarding the nation's security of supply, the jurisdictions of relevant ministries (the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Communications, the Ministry of Regional Affairs), and specific legislation (the Emergency Act). They employ specialized terminology, such as "stockpiling center" and "physical reserves," and stress the exact division of responsibilities. The analysis centers on the administrative organization and the legal formalization of accountability.

The expertise is limited to the legislative focus on taxation and excise policy. The speaker is familiar with specific financial instruments (excise, tax-free threshold) but neither uses data nor provides detailed justifications. The knowledge is presented through a brief and technical introduction to the content of the draft legislation.

The speaker demonstrates expertise in tax legislation and fiscal terminology (income tax rates for individuals and legal entities). Specific numerical data (18%, 18.3%) is used, but detailed elaboration is avoided, with the speaker referring instead to a procedural role.

The speaker demonstrates profound technical and doctrinal expertise in national defense, particularly in the field of artillery, referring to himself as a "career military officer." Specific terminology and data are used (e.g., K9 Kõu, HIMARS, 120 mm mortars, 36 self-propelled howitzers, division artillery), and Estonian capabilities (e.g., 24 systems) are compared with those of Finland (1,690 systems). He provides detailed recommendations concerning the structure of the division artillery (wheeled artillery systems), the mechanization of mortars, and the domestic production of ammunition.

The speaker demonstrates expertise in tax policy and macroeconomic concepts (such as turnover, recession, and revenue collection). Specific figures and percentage comparisons (e.g., 2 percentage points or 10%) are used to frame the arguments. The expertise is focused on forecasting the negative consequences of the tax hike.

The speaker demonstrates expertise in the field of national defense and parliamentary procedure, emphasizing the role of the National Defense Committee in discussing defense-related topics. This expertise is evident in the use of the specific term "national defense lands" and the knowledge of which committees ought to have been consulted.