By Plenary Sessions: Leo Kunnas

The criticism is aimed at the Government Office regarding the slow handling of the draft bill, a process that has spanned two years. The report also highlights the Ministry of Regional Affairs' inadequate physical infrastructure for managing reserves, stressing that responsibility must be assigned to an organization that possesses the necessary capacity to carry out the work. The criticism is procedural and functional.

Insufficient data.

Insufficient data.

The main criticism is directed at the government and the prime minister, who are accused of a slow decision-making process and insufficient ambition in developing indirect fire capability. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, emphasizing that current developments are the result of decisions made by previous governments, and new critical decisions (e.g., regarding the division's artillery) are being postponed.

The opposition is directed against the government's economic policy, particularly the raising of the value-added tax (VAT). The criticism is purely political and economic, emphasizing that the tax hike is economically inefficient and will reduce turnover. There are no personal or procedural attacks directed at the opponents.

The criticism is directed at a procedural flaw, given that the committee handling the topic evidently failed to approach the National Defence Committee for its opinion. The objection is procedural, not politically substantive, and is articulated in the form of a question.