By Plenary Sessions: Urmas Kruuse

The speaker's style is formal, critical, and data-driven, relying on economic logic and statistical comparisons. Indignation is expressed regarding the tone of the bill's proceedings, which is deemed to belong to the previous century. The argumentation focuses on the consequences, such as passing taxes onto clients and sending a negative signal to investors.

The style is twofold: as a representative of the commission, it is formal, neutral, and procedural, focusing on emphasizing consensus and communicating decisions. When posing questions to the minister, the tone becomes critical and concerned, utilizing rhetorical questions to highlight social contradictions (e.g., political pressure versus uncertainty).