By Plenary Sessions: Urmas Kruuse

The main opposition is directed at the bill's initiators, whose approach to taxing the banking sector is deemed disproportionate and illogical. The criticism is rooted in both policy and substance, demanding that the initiators acknowledge the idea of the bill (being consigned to the dustbin of history). It is emphasized that boundless taxation will lead to the recovery of funds from clients.

The criticism is aimed at systemic deficiencies in social policy, particularly concerning the rise in the number of alimony defaulters and the decreasing reliability of partnership relations, which generates uncertainty. There is no direct personal antagonism; the criticism is policy-based, and questions are being posed to the minister.