By Plenary Sessions: Urmas Kruuse

The style is formal and respectful, addressing the esteemed Chair and the honorable presenter. The rhetoric is logical and investigative, focusing on framing the discussion and identifying hypothetical counterarguments. The speaker emphasizes that they are not inquiring about the presenter's personal viewpoint, thereby maintaining a neutral tone.

The style is formal and respectful, addressing both the presiding officer and the Minister. The address is logically structured, first describing the observed problem (the lack of tickets and regional inequality) and then presenting a direct political question concerning the improvement of the situation.

The speech is formal and respectful, employing the salutations "Honorable Chair of the Session" and "Esteemed Colleagues." The tone is serious and concerned, highlighting the danger of the situation and the necessity for a fundamental reassessment. The speaker makes balanced use of historical facts, statistical data, and rhetorical questions to engage the audience and underscore the gravity of the issue.

The rhetorical style is formal, substantive, and procedural, fitting the role of the representative of the steering committee. The speech is structured around logical arguments and the clarification of technical details, highlighting the technical nature of the draft legislation and the fact that the public sector workload will remain unchanged. Emotional appeals are absent; the focus is strictly on facts and the consensual process.