By Plenary Sessions: Urmas Kruuse

The speaker expresses moderate criticism regarding the minister's position on the 40% threshold in regional policy, arguing that border areas require relaxed criteria for these thresholds. The criticism is policy-based and focuses on the disparities in economic indicators between Tallinn and Southern Estonia. There is no direct personal attack or preclusion of compromise.

There is not enough data.

The criticism is aimed at political opponents who initiated a criminal case over residency registration, suggesting that the legal system may be subject to political abuse. Furthermore, there is indirect opposition to current educational practices that rely on entrance exams, which are now viewed as obsolete.

Not enough data

No direct criticism is leveled against the opposing faction, but the speaker casts doubt on the effectiveness of the notification procedures used by the local municipality and the crisis commission. The criticism is aimed rather at procedural shortcomings or human error, not specific individuals.

The opposition is aimed at specific colleagues (Aleksei Jevgrafov and Andrei Korobeinik), criticizing their failure to clearly define the initiative for their draft legislation. The criticism remains procedural, defending the committee's decisions while avoiding personal attacks. He/She also criticizes the wasting of effort in the chamber discussing the summons, stressing that everyone should find solutions independently.