By Plenary Sessions: Andrei Korobeinik

The style is sharply critical, sarcastic, and at times, mocking, especially directed at the Reform Party, which is described as going through the five stages of grief (denial, anger, bargaining). The tone is urgent, stressing the necessity of immediate action, and combines logical arguments (economic indicators) with political taunting. The text employs rhetorical questions and direct calls for the government to resign.

The rhetorical style is analytical, yet sharp and often sarcastic, particularly when directed at the coalition and the chair of the session. He employs both logical arguments (economic data, tax administration) and emotional appeals (taking money right out of pensioners' pockets). The overall tone is one of concern and criticism, pointing to the establishment of new negative traditions and the deterioration of parliamentary democracy.

The style is sharp, critical, and at times personal, accusing the opposing side (Jürgen) of avoiding answers and employing rhetorical techniques (gaslighting, manspreading). The speaker utilizes both logical arguments (connections related to indexing) and emotional appeals (pensioners losing money) to emphasize the injustice of the draft bill. He uses strong judgments, calling the bill "deeply unjust" and referencing former Prime Minister Ansip's criticism regarding the government's incompetence.

The rhetorical style is sharp, critical, and pressing, highlighting the gravity of the economic crisis and the government's accountability. Strong moral appeals are employed against injustice (favoring the rich at the expense of the poor) alongside direct political attacks aimed at the Prime Minister's personal choices. The speaker also utilizes irony and references to former politicians (Ansip, Ratas) to bolster their arguments.