By Plenary Sessions: Andrei Korobeinik

There is a lack of openness regarding cooperation; instead, there is sharp criticism directed at the slow pace and inability of the coalition partners (Eesti 200) to make decisions, even after having been in the coalition for a long time. It is emphasized that the coalition is incapable of making sensible decisions.

The representative acts on behalf of the Centre Party faction, presenting their proposals and speaking positively about their fellow faction members. They are open to supporting sound proposals (such as those regarding fruits and vegetables), but their interaction with the coalition is confrontational. As a representative of the opposition, they feel unfairly treated and ignored, which hinders cooperation.

Data is lacking regarding current cooperation or willingness to compromise. The speaker emphasizes the positive results achieved during the Centre Party-led government via extraordinary pension increases, referring to this as the only way to reduce the divide.

The style of cooperation is pragmatic, seeking support from the opposition (by referencing similarities with the EKRE draft bill) and stressing the need for joint decisions to rescue the economy. Hope is expressed that Eesti 200 might represent the voice of common sense within the government, although there is general skepticism regarding the coalition partners.