By Plenary Sessions: Rene Kokk

The rhetorical style is direct, analytical, and interrogative, challenging the presenter regarding the political direction. The tone is businesslike and emphasizes logical connections and the need for a swift resolution, based on market data (the emergence of price spreads).

The rhetorical style is forceful and persuasive, stressing the necessity of tackling the issue "right now." It utilizes both statistical data (a logical appeal) and an emotional focus on the difficult choices reservists face between supporting their families and contributing to national defense. The speaker is direct and critical of those who claim that the draft legislation cannot be amended.

The rhetorical style is combative, direct, and demanding, dismissing the minister's introduction as "verbose nonsense." The speaker repeatedly employs rhetorical and practical questions to challenge the actual merit of the bill, while simultaneously addressing the public watching the broadcast.

The rhetorical style is sharply aggressive and demanding, employing emotional phrases such as "you are attacking with a tax festival." The speaker emphasizes the illegitimacy of the government's actions, repeatedly citing low approval ratings (below 19%) and raising critical questions regarding accountability and feedback. The appeals target both logic (the inadequacy of funding) and emotion (the perspective of the average citizen).

The style is critical, serious, and questioning, utilizing rhetorical questions to call into doubt previous official narratives. Emotionally charged language is employed (e.g., "tremendous imposition"), and there is an appeal to ethical responsibility and conscience.

The rhetorical style is critical and questioning, expressing astonishment at the opposition ("strange"). Logical arguments are employed, emphasizing a constructive approach and casting doubt on the opponents' understanding of the draft bill under consideration. The tone is direct and procedure-centric.