By Plenary Sessions: Rene Kokk

The style of cooperation is formal and interrogative, aimed at the presenter, from whom confirmation or discussion is sought regarding the proposed alternative solution. There is no information available concerning cross-party cooperation or a willingness to compromise.

The speaker is open to cooperation and compromise, urging colleagues to allow the draft bill to proceed to the next reading so that the necessary amendments can be introduced. He positively references the reasonable proposals made by other colleagues (such as Varro Vooglaid and Leo Kunnas) regarding the coefficient and indexation. He expresses confidence in the National Defense Committee’s capacity to thoroughly discuss the bill.

There is no information regarding any willingness to cooperate or compromise; the speeches are aimed at sharply challenging the policies of the minister and the government and holding them accountable.

Not enough data.

The speaker supports cooperation within the framework of the investigative committee, stressing that this would provide an opportunity for explanations to all parties involved. This demonstrates a readiness for a formal parliamentary inquiry.

The speaker emphasizes that obtaining information from ministers is "in the interest of us all," referring to the desire to find a solution that would ensure broad-based and constructive parliamentary oversight. He/She asks the opposing side for justifications, which indicates a wish to understand the underlying reasons for their opposition.