By Plenary Sessions: Rene Kokk

The political position is strongly oppositional, focusing on criticizing the government’s tax policy and excessive regulation (such as sustainability reports and the biofuel mandate). Key issues include national security (reinstating the use of anti-personnel mines) and stimulating the economy through income tax reduction. Their political activity is framed by accusations that the government is arrogant, incompetent, and fails to stand up for Estonian interests in Europe. They emphasize that EKRE has repeatedly proposed solutions which the government has later reluctantly adopted.

The political focus is currently on national security, particularly regarding the failed inspection of the tanker Jaguar and the overall level of Estonia’s operational capability. The speaker harshly criticizes the government’s handling of the situation, raising serious questions about the chain of decision-making, the accessibility of ministers, and a potential information leak. The criticism targets the government’s actions and lack of transparency, stressing that simply denying the existence of problems won’t change the reality of the situation.

The political focus is centered on fiscal responsibility and the reform of public administration. The speaker strongly opposes the tax hikes implemented over a short period, particularly the increase in the income tax rate. The main requirement is reducing the number of civil servants and lowering the administrative burden in order to make the state "leaner." This stance is heavily directed toward criticizing the government's actions and overall performance.

The political stance is strongly opposed to the government's plan to import cheap labor, viewing it as a threat to both the Estonian economy and national security. Emphasis is placed on the need to support the domestic workforce, innovation, and lifelong learning. The position is presented critically, accusing the government of ignoring specialists and threat assessments, and moving towards the Swedish migration model.

The political position is strongly oppositional, focusing on criticizing the coalition's actions regarding double standards (gender quotas) and injustice (compensation, local government funding). The main themes are improving economic competitiveness through withdrawal from CO2 regulation and fair compensation for private property in the event of restrictions. The framework is strongly value-based and performance-driven, accusing the government of incompetence and creating absurd situations.

The political position is strongly oppositional, questioning the government's legitimacy due to low approval ratings (below 20%). Key issues include ensuring energy security through oil shale energy and opposing justice reforms that violate the public's sense of fairness, particularly concerning the accelerated release of prisoners. The framing is value-based (justice, national wealth) and performance-based (the government's failure).

A strong oppositional stance, focusing on improving the cost of living and economic competitiveness by lowering excise duties and VAT. Criticism is aimed at the government’s priorities (such as cutting family benefits, Rail Baltic, and wind energy) and poor budget management. The political framework is primarily results-based, stressing the necessity of supporting the Estonian people and businesses rather than seeking European approval. Politicians should be realists and try again if their previous proposals have failed to pass.

The political position is strongly opposed to the government's reforms, particularly concerning the funding of social welfare and the restructuring of educational institutions. It is emphasized that the state shifted responsibility onto local municipalities without adequate funding, labeling the social welfare reform a failure. The policy is directed towards preserving regional life and communities, standing in opposition to centralization.