By Plenary Sessions: Rene Kokk

The speaker is active in the Riigikogu plenary sitting, presenting bills (Draft Act 597 amending the Income Tax Act) and participating in debates with ministers. He/She refers to previous participation in the Economic Affairs Committee sitting and debates with the Minister of Finance. He/She is consistent in recalling EKRE's earlier proposals (2022/2023).

The speaker is active during the Riigikogu's Question Time, quickly responding to the high-level security incident that occurred last week. This pattern demonstrates immediate responsiveness and oversight of the government's actions, focusing on recent events and media coverage.

The data is limited to two questions posed to the minister during the plenary session, which suggests activity during parliamentary question times. It is not possible to define other patterns of activity or frequency of occurrence.

The speaker actively participates in the plenary debates, referencing previous, recurring discussions held in the chamber. They monitor and cite public media broadcasts ("Täistund") to bolster their political arguments. They demand that the minister show courtesy and remain present until the conclusion of the sitting.

The speaker is active in the plenary sessions over two consecutive days (May 14 and 15), posing several questions both to the rapporteurs and to the minister. This pattern of activity demonstrates a focus on the details of the draft legislation and their potential negative consequences, particularly concerning environmental and economic issues.

The patterns of activity demonstrate active participation in plenary sessions, involving recurring questions posed to both the minister and the rapporteur on issues concerning both justice and energy policy. The speeches focus on the critical analysis of government bills and the proposal of alternative political solutions.

Insufficient data.

The speaker actively participates in the plenary session, submitting interpellations that focus on the minister's responsibility and substantive contribution. He/She stresses the necessity of meeting with local stakeholders (Märjamaa municipality, the community, the school body) and demands that the minister immerse himself/herself deeply in the situation on location, rather than merely remaining in Tallinn.