By Plenary Sessions: Rene Kokk

Direct criticism is aimed at the practices of the judicial system concerning the imposition of sentences and the early release of serious offenders. Specific political opponents or groups are not named; the criticism targets the system's operation and its results.

The criticism is aimed at scrutinizing the government's actions in the field of security, specifically by questioning the minister regarding any further incidents and how they are being handled. There are no personal or political attacks involved; this is purely the execution of an oversight function.

The main opponents are the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Communications (for reversing policy) and the Republic's Electoral Committee (for incompetence). The most intense criticism is aimed at the politicians governing the country, who are accused of providing "political cover" protecting the e-voting system. The criticism is primarily procedural and results-based.

The main opponent is the ruling coalition, especially the Reform Party, which is being criticized for procedural arrogance and a lack of substantive debate. The criticism targets both the content of the policy (the car tax) and the quality of the procedure (ignoring the opposition's proposals). Compromise regarding the car tax is ruled out, with demands for its cancellation.

The main opponents are government ministers, who are being criticized for improper conduct and concealing information, and the Riigikogu Board for irresponsible organization of work. Criticism is directed both at the substance of the policy (the prison project) and procedural errors, particularly the withholding of information between the coalition and the opposition. The opposition is intense and demands immediate corrective action.

The primary criticism targets government and ministry representatives, who are accused of miscalculating the economic impact of the draft legislation and avoiding meaningful debate. The criticism also addresses previous financial incompetence, citing the failure to utilize 100 million euros allocated under the MKM budget line and the confusion surrounding the financing of the gas power plant.