By Plenary Sessions: Rene Kokk

The speaker heavily focuses on issues concerning the legal system and penal policy, stressing the necessity of aligning court judgments with public expectations regarding just sentencing. They indirectly criticize judicial practices that allow serious offenders early release, highlighting the risk of recidivism. The stance is both value-driven and results-oriented, emphasizing public safety and the effectiveness of the administration of justice.

The political focus is centered on national security and territorial integrity, stressing the necessity of obtaining information regarding attack drone incidents within Estonian territory. This constitutes a results-based approach, where up-to-date information is being sought from the government (the minister) regarding the management of the security situation.

The political position centers on strong opposition to the premature termination of the thematic plan concerning mineral resources, emphasizing the necessity of long-term certainty for businesses and families. A second focus is the sharp criticism directed at the e-voting system and the National Electoral Committee, which is viewed as a failure of state governance operating under political cover. These positions are strongly performance- and policy-driven, demanding clarity and accountability.

The political stance is firmly in opposition, criticizing the government's low approval rating (12%) and its sheer incompetence (accusing them of having "made a complete mess of things"). The primary points of contention are the proposed car tax and the move to grant the government powers for rapid response, bypassing the Riigikogu (Parliament). The speaker calls into question the government's legitimacy, focusing on both procedural and results-based arguments.

The political stance is fiercely oppositional, centered on criticizing the deficiencies in the logic and impact assessments of the government's draft legislation (the prison project). Furthermore, there is a strong insistence on procedural integrity and transparency within the Riigikogu's operations, particularly concerning the sharing of classified or sensitive information. This line of attack is directed at exposing shortcomings in the government's overall activity and management (performance).

The political position strongly supports a specific, socially focused bill, which is viewed very favorably. This stance is primarily focused on demonstrating the policy's effectiveness and economic benefit, stressing that the actual cost is lower than initially estimated. Criticism is leveled against the government and the ministry, who appear to be either underestimating the bill's substantive economic impact or dismissing it outright.