By Plenary Sessions: Rene Kokk
Total Sessions: 110
Fully Profiled: 110
2025-10-14
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The primary criticism is aimed at the submitters of the draft bill (the Minister/Ministry), who are accused of poor legislative drafting, the pretense of inclusion, and unjustified rushing. The criticism is intense and focuses on both procedural flaws (urgency) and substantive issues (disregard for client safety). The overemphasis on the interests of businesses over those of the client is also subject to criticism.
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The main opponent is the minister who submitted the amendments to the Planning Act, criticizing them on both procedural and substantive grounds. The criticism is intense and uncompromising, calling points in the draft bill "utterly ridiculous" and accusing the minister of doing the exact opposite of what he had said.
2025-10-07
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The main opponent is the Reform Party and the government, who are directly blamed for causing the poor economic situation and the low quality of budget planning. The criticism is intense and focuses on procedural and political failures, particularly the massive volume of budget reallocations. The speaker rejects the minister's attempt to criticize the Institute of Economic Research, redirecting the blame back to the ruling party.
2025-09-24
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
The primary criticism is directed at the majority in the Riigikogu, who vehemently voted against the establishment of the Rail Baltic investigative committee, citing procedural obstruction. Estonian media is also criticized, which, in the speaker's estimation, is either unwilling to cover or actively prevents the coverage of the issues faced by landowners.
2025-09-23
15th Riigikogu, 6th session, plenary session
The criticism is aimed at the government policy represented by the minister, particularly regarding the centralization of services and the inconvenient payment solutions implemented by the PPA (Police and Border Guard Board). The opposition is political, focusing on the negative effects of these administrative decisions on citizens, and accuses the state of shifting costs onto private individuals.
2025-09-09
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session.
The primary target is the Minister of Defence, who is being criticized for both substantive issues (such as the lack of resources and the state of the Defence League) and procedural missteps. The criticism is intense, demanding that the minister acknowledge the problems—to "put on sackcloth and ashes" (i.e., admit fault)—and refrain from delivering an overly optimistic report.
2025-09-04
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The criticism is mainly aimed at the governing coalition and the chairpersons of the Riigikogu sessions. The government is criticized for incomplete draft legislation and a lack of proper analysis (the car tax), as well as for the low level of political culture. The chairpersons are criticized for incompetent session management, bias, and a lack of courage to intervene when dealing with ministers.
2025-06-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The primary adversary is the distrusted minister and the governing coalition. The criticism is fundamental, targeting both the minister's personal values and specific political decisions (the reduction of child benefits, gender quotas, security policy). The intensity of the attack is high, implying that the minister is misleading the public and ought to review their activities.
2025-06-09
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The primary targets of criticism are the rapporteur and the Prime Minister, who are accused of either ignorance or misunderstanding the question, providing only theoretical answers. The criticism is directed at the actions of the officials and the respondents' inability to provide concrete, real-world data, which indicates a strong distrust of the executive branch's responses.
2025-06-04
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main targets of criticism are the Committee for the Supervision of Party Financing (ERJK), whose proceedings are deemed ridiculous, and colleague Kalle’s stance on the necessity of landmines. Jüri Ratas is criticized regarding his involvement in the entertainment business and advertisements, suggesting the need to audit the funding of his activities.
2025-06-03
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fifth session, plenary session
The primary objection is directed at the government's inaction and its failure to deliver on promises, demanding concrete steps to implement the coalition agreement. Separately, government member Keldo is criticized for promoting the mass importation of foreign labor, which the speaker deems an unnecessary and unwise solution.
2025-05-21
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The main opponents are the governing coalition and specific ministers (Kristen Michal, Jürgen Ligi, Andres Sutt), who are criticized for hypocrisy, the sudden shift in policy (the Ottawa Convention), and stifling the economy. The criticism is intense, accusing the government of being unable to empathize with the average Estonian person and ignoring the country's economic interests. Critics further fault the government for failing to explain the necessity of tax increases or even knowing where tax revenue actually originates.
2025-05-21
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing.
Strong opposition is directed at the Government of the Republic, particularly the Prime Minister and the relevant ministers, accusing them of denying the failure and covering up information. The criticism is both procedural (citing a lack of a clear decision-making chain and the unavailability of ministers) and based on competence (specifically, the failed apprehension). The speaker suggests that the government attempted to keep the incident secret from the Estonian people for 24 hours.
2025-05-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Intense opposition is directed at the government and the minister, who are being criticized for tax hikes and accused of misleading the public regarding the true extent of the increase in the tax burden. The criticism is politically sharp, focusing on the government's inability to streamline the state.
2025-05-19
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session.
The primary opposition is the government and Minister Keldo, who is being criticized both for political decisions (specifically regarding foreign labor) and for impolite conduct in the Riigikogu. The criticism is intense, accusing the government of systematic and deliberate actions that completely disregard the input from special services and advisors. Minister Keldo’s behavior is being labeled as both impolite and incompetent.
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The main targets of criticism are the coalition and the government (Ministry of Climate), who are accused of applying double standards and increasing bureaucracy. The criticism is intense and focuses on both policy (insufficient compensation, the CO2 system) and procedural unfairness (imposing laws by force). There is a lack of willingness to compromise, especially regarding exiting the CO2 regulation.
2025-05-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The main adversary is the ruling coalition, which is being criticized both for its political decisions (the termination of oil shale energy production, judicial reforms) and for its lack of political legitimacy. The criticism is intense, accusing the government of unfair representation on administrative boards and demanding snap elections.
2025-05-07
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The primary adversaries are the government (the coalition), the Reform Party, and Eesti 200, along with various officials and agencies. Criticism is aimed at political decisions (the tax hike/spree, priorities) and outright incompetence (specifically, the Climate Ministry's lack of knowledge and officials' calculations that are completely divorced from reality). The attacks are intense, accusing the government of failing to prioritize the people and businesses of Estonia, and demanding snap elections.
2025-05-05
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The primary criticism is aimed squarely at the ministers and ministries (specifically the Ministry of Education and Research, and the Minister of Regional Affairs and Agriculture), who stand accused of blame-shifting and a fundamental lack of political will. The criticism is intense, alleging that the ministries have made hasty decisions driven purely by cost-cutting measures, while simultaneously ignoring community opposition. The Minister is urged to fundamentally reconsider their decisions and truly delve into the core issues.
2025-04-24
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The confrontation is aimed at members of parliament who fail to grasp the fundamental problem of wind energy, and especially at those opponents attempting to ridicule and obstruct the investigation into health damages linked to wind turbines. The criticism is intense and principled, accusing the opposition of shameful conduct and ignorance.
2025-04-21
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The speaker strongly opposes the e-voting system and directs a critical question toward the Centre Party, asking for their stance on abolishing e-voting. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based, focusing on the fundamental flaws of the system.
2025-04-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main criticism is directed against the coalition, which is accused of ignoring the opposition's proposals and lacking a willingness to listen during the proceedings. The criticism is intense and focuses both on the substance of the law and on the procedural flaws in the legislative process. Compromise is ruled out, as the complete annulment of the law is being demanded.
2025-04-09
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
The primary targets of criticism are the governing coalition and the Social Democrats (SDE), who are accused of imitating the opposition while simultaneously supporting bills detrimental to the Estonian people. Criticism is aimed both at the substance of the policies (the car tax, inconsistencies in the green transition) and at the procedure (arrogance, failure to do their homework/lack of preparation). Political dishonesty is criticized particularly harshly, citing Kaja Kallas’s previous denials regarding tax hikes.
2025-04-09
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, information briefing
The criticism is directed at a systemic and historical administrative error that left the reservists in limbo, despite their previous subordination to the Ministry of Internal Affairs. Direct political opponents or groups are not criticized; instead, the necessity of resolving this administrative problem is emphasized.
2025-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The main opponents are the government (the ruling parties), Finance Minister Mart Võrklaev, and the Social Democrats. Mart Võrklaev has been personally singled out as the chief ideologue and enforcer of the car tax, who will go down in history in a negative light. The criticism is intense, accusing the government of recklessness, stifling the economy, and engaging in 'steamroller politics' that ignores the reasonable proposals put forth by the opposition.
2025-03-24
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session.
The criticism is aimed at the direction of energy policy, as presented by the government or its spokesperson, which places a strong focus on wind turbines. The opposition is policy-based, suggesting that the current focus is ineffective and amounts to "playing a one-sided game."
2025-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The criticism is directed at the Ministry of Defence, the Defence Forces, and the KRA, who are accused of neglecting the indexation of reservists' remuneration between 2018 and 2022. The speaker is sharply opposed to the proposal to reject the draft bill, stressing that members of the Riigikogu always have the option to submit amendments. He opposes those who "call black white" and claim that nothing can be changed.
2025-03-18
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fifth sitting, plenary session
The main adversaries are the government (via the minister whose plans regarding foreign prisoners are being criticized) and, especially, the Eesti 200 political party. The criticism is intense, focusing both on political plans and ethical violations, accusing the party of gaining political benefit through fraud.
2025-03-17
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The main opponent is the ruling coalition, which is being criticized both for its policies (tax hikes, education cuts) and for its lack of procedural legitimacy. The criticism is intense, accusing the government of attacking the people and demanding that decisions be made that the public understands and finds beneficial. The opposition is absolute, calling into question the government's very right to push decisions through.
2025-03-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The opposition is aimed at the individuals or institutions who pushed the COVID-19 vaccine, despite insufficient research and inaccurate claims regarding its efficacy. The criticism is intense and addresses ethical accountability, as well as the fact that earlier arguments (such as preventing infection) have proven to be incorrect.
2025-03-12
15th Riigikogu, Fifth Session, Plenary Session
The opposition is aimed at "some political parties" and specifically at six committee members who voted against the draft bill that would increase ministerial accountability. The criticism is procedural, accusing the opponents of taking an unconstructive approach and suggesting they might not have understood the substance of the bill under discussion. Valdo Randpere is criticized separately because of the context of his questions.
2025-02-27
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The confrontation is directed at the government, particularly the Minister of the Climate Ministry, who is accused of misrepresenting data and a lack of transparency. The criticism is intense and includes allegations of corruption, conflicts of interest, and the possible involvement of shell companies or shelf companies in shaping energy policy.
2025-02-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Criticism is aimed at the Environmental Board, which falls under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Climate, and which is deemed incapable of regulating the population and issuing a sufficient number of hunting permits. Opponents of the draft bill are also criticized for failing to understand the problems facing rural life and the scale of the damage. The speaker warns that a lack of regulation could lead to vigilantism, resulting in hunters shooting animals without the necessary licenses.
2025-02-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, press briefing
The opposition is directed at the government and the prime minister, criticizing the unfair implementation of the car tax and the illogical subsidy schemes. The criticism is policy-based, focusing on the tax system's failure to establish uniformity and fairness.
2025-02-25
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main opposition is directed against the coalition supporting the current version of constitutional amendment bill 536, especially the provision concerning the voting rights of stateless persons. The criticism is political and intense, expressing astonishment that the Riigikogu is even discussing such a matter. He/She also criticizes the lack of information regarding the citizenship status of individuals residing in the country.
2025-02-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The primary backlash is aimed at the Prime Minister and the government. Justice and Digital Minister Liisa-Ly Pakosta is facing particular criticism regarding the plan to hand over state data to Meta free of charge. The criticism is intense, directly suggesting the possibility of corruption, personal gain, or the careless squandering of state assets. Demands are being made for the initiation of supervisory proceedings against the minister.
2025-01-28
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Insufficient data
2025-01-27
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main opponent is the minister, whose alleged consensus regarding social quagmires is being criticized sharply and intensely. The criticism is values-driven, focusing on the groundlessness of the minister's claims and the unanswered question posed by a parent, while referencing the potential "atrocity" of the minister's position (drawing a parallel with lobotomy).
2025-01-22
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session.
The main opponents are the governing coalition and the Social Democrats, who are being called upon to return to their roots. The criticism is policy-based (focusing on tax hikes and budget inefficiency) and intense, accusing the coalition of sidelining the opposition's draft legislation. The government's proposed solutions (transfer payments instead of direct food aid) are viewed as inappropriate and humiliating to the public.
2025-01-16
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The main criticism is directed at the government and ministries (Ministry of Finance, MKM), accusing them of the failure of the activity-based budget project and the inability to detect budgetary errors. The criticism is procedural and political, highlighting systemic deficiencies and the inaction of the responsible parties.
2025-01-15
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, information briefing
The primary targets of the criticism are the Prime Minister and the government (including the Minister of Infrastructure) for Nordica's management failures and for keeping the audit secret. The criticism is intense, focusing on the government's inaction and lack of transparency, and demanding answers to the questions that remain unanswered.
2025-01-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The primary criticism is aimed at members of the Government of the Republic and the commission's representative, who are accused of fundamentally misunderstanding the issues and disregarding the will of the Riigikogu. The criticism is both intense and procedural, demanding a concrete timeline from the Government for rectifying the situation, rather than simply sweeping the matter aside.
2025-01-13
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The criticism is aimed at the government's energy policy, particularly regarding the plan to construct a gas power plant, which could increase reliance on external supply. The criticism is policy-based and focuses on risk analysis and deficiencies in supply security.
2024-12-18
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The main criticism is aimed at the Climate Minister and the government, who are accused of lobbying for business interests and reducing the requirement for public engagement. The criticism is intense, labeling the government's actions as hypocritical and foolish. The opposition targets both the substance of the policy (a faster exit from oil shale) and procedural flaws (the reduction of public involvement).
2024-12-12
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
There is no direct confrontation or criticism aimed at specific opponents or political groups. The questions are directed to the minister in order to find solutions for the shortcomings in policy implementation.
2024-12-10
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The main opposition is directed against the government's car tax policy, which is considered poor and detrimental. The criticism is policy-based, citing the lack of procedural solutions and challenging the Ministry of Finance's stance regarding the accessibility of transport in rural areas. Mart Võrklaev, noted as a car tax expert, was also mentioned, and his absence as a presenter caused disappointment.
2024-12-09
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting
The primary opponent is the government, which is fiercely criticized for breaking political promises and implementing a cascade of taxes that harms families. The criticism is policy-driven and results-oriented, accusing the government of putting families under attack and stripping stay-at-home mothers of their health insurance.
2024-12-04
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
The primary opponent is the rapporteur—a self-proclaimed social democrat—and, more broadly, the government's excise policy. The criticism is intense, focusing on the policy's illogical nature and accusing the opposing side of failing to grasp the core issue and of generating smuggling. The speaker casts doubt on the opponent's integrity, noting that their stance shifts depending on whether they are in opposition or part of the ruling coalition.
2024-12-03
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The speaker is taking an oppositional stance toward the presenter, criticizing the lack of transparency and the incompleteness of the materials submitted. The criticism is strictly procedural, focusing on the unavailability of the referenced documents and the ambiguity surrounding the date of the committee discussion. The intensity of the challenge is moderate but targeted, repeatedly demanding that the information be made public.
2024-11-21
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
The opposition is directed against the state and the leaders of aggressive climate crisis communication, who are accused of hypocrisy regarding their mineral resource policy. Critics are targeting the political decision to condemn the use of oil shale, while the government simultaneously considers mining phosphorite as a source of state revenue, despite the environmental hazards involved.
2024-11-20
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The main opponents are coalition members, who are criticized for their lack of backbone and political naivety regarding loyalty issues. Criticism is also directed at the rapporteur, who is required to provide explanations regarding the number of grey passport holders and the mechanisms by which they came into being. The opposition is both policy-based (the removal of voting rights) and procedural (doing things properly, not just for the sake of ticking a box).
2024-11-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The main opponent is the ruling coalition, which is fiercely criticized for its political choices (child benefits, car tax) and its moral priorities. The criticism is intense and encompasses both political and value-based accusations, such as granting pedophiles the right to work with children.
2024-11-07
15th Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
The primary targets of criticism are the coalition MPs, who are being slammed for their low attendance and failure to support the investigative committee, suggesting they have something to hide. High-paid executives are also under fire, particularly those whose handling of major projects (the Nordica example) has been unsuccessful. The criticism is directed both at the procedures themselves and the overall lack of transparency.
2024-11-06
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The primary adversary is the proponent (or rapporteur) of the car tax, who is being criticized both personally (through sarcastic labeling) and procedurally. The criticism is intense and calls into question the quality of the committee's work, as crucial implementation issues were allegedly not discussed.
2024-11-06
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, information briefing
The main opponents are the Minister of Climate (due to the car tax) and the Minister of Education (due to school closures). The Prime Minister is also being criticized over procedural issues. The criticism is directed at the illogical nature of the policy (the car tax) and the government's priorities (closing schools versus subsidizing wind energy). The speaker also refers to an anonymous Ministry of Education and Research (HTM) official whose alleged dream is to close schools, and directly refutes the ministers' claims.
2024-11-04
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The main criticism is directed at the Ministry of Education, which is accused of "tunnel vision" and prioritizing cost savings over regional needs. The criticism is intense and political in nature, stressing that the state is offloading unresolved issues and costs onto local municipalities. The opposition is aimed at a specific closure plan.
2024-10-23
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
The main opponents are the Minister of Finance and the Minister of Internal Affairs, and more broadly, the Government of the Republic. Criticism is aimed both at political decisions (fine rates, special tools) and procedural opacity (the budget, lack of argumentation). The opposition is intense, demanding the rejection of the draft bill and comprehensive solutions to security issues, calling the minister's actions a "half-finished calculation."
2024-10-22
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The challenge is directed against the policies and procedures of the Government of the Republic, criticizing the additional burden imposed by new regulations (the sustainability report) and the disproportionate increase in fine rates. The criticism is both policy-based and procedural, demanding that the government clarify the rationale behind these decisions and present its underlying considerations.
2024-10-21
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The primary opposition is the government and the minister in charge, whose policies are being criticized for incompetence, short-sightedness, and irrational resource management. Criticism is also aimed at ministry officials (the Deputy Secretary General) who have spent years advancing issues that previous ministers had deliberately shelved. The government’s actions are being compared to the practices seen in European countries (Italy-Albania), where problems are simply offloaded onto weaker states.
2024-10-16
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The main opponents are the government as a whole, the Minister of Finance, and Läänemets, the leader of the Social Democrats. Criticism is aimed both at the government’s procedures (specifically, the basis for tax increases, which relies on a small number of companies) and at administrative irregularities. Furthermore, the minister’s personal attitude and rhetoric are also under fire.
2024-10-15
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
Strong opposition is directed at the policies of the Ministry of Finance and the Minister (Jürgen), especially concerning excise duty hikes. The criticism is both political (ineffective measures, loss of tax revenue) and ideological, accusing them of adopting social democratic (Läänemets's) anti-consumption ideas. The Reform Party is also criticized for abandoning its previous principle of focusing on economic growth.
2024-10-14
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
The main criticism is aimed at the actions of the ministry and the minister, accusing them of incompetence and inefficient cost management. The criticism focuses on specific policy changes (reducing subsidies, extending processing times) and administrative decisions (IT costs versus jobs). No willingness to compromise has been expressed; instead, they demand that the existing IT system be made operational.
2024-10-10
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth sitting, plenary session.
The opposition is directed at the initiators of the bill and its content, demanding the immediate cessation of the proceedings. The criticism is intense and fundamental, calling into question the entire idea of allowing pedophiles the opportunity to work with children. Compromise is ruled out, as the complete termination of any further processing of the bill is being demanded.
2024-10-09
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth Session, Plenary Session.
The main criticism is aimed at the government and ministers, who are accused of lacking strategic oversight and being incompetent. Particular criticism is leveled against the minister who is seemingly unaware of the high unemployment rate among Estonians, while simultaneously proposing to triple the immigration quota. The criticism is intense and centers on political failure.
2024-10-07
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session
The primary criticism is aimed at the Government of the Republic and former Climate Minister Kristen Michal, faulting them for both the delayed response and the insufficient prioritization of road construction. The current situation is being contrasted with the achievements of the national-conservative government that took office in 2019, which originally initiated the projects currently in progress.
2024-09-16
The 15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting.
The main opponents are the recent governments, which are accused of creating instability, disregarding families, and endangering national security. Criticism is also aimed at the heads of various agencies, who are seen as propagating the ideology of the previous ruling parties ("the deep state"). The Ministry of Climate is criticized separately because, in their view, it has been tasked with defending economic interests rather than protecting the environment.
2024-09-11
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
The criticism targets the government's inaction or insufficient plans, particularly concerning the initiation of domestic ammunition production and the capacity for utilizing tire crumb domestically. There are no direct attacks or clear opposition directed at specific political groups; the criticism is focused on policy and procedure.
2024-09-09
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The opposition is primarily aimed at the Ministry of Climate and former Climate Minister Kristen Michal, who is being criticized for the political decision to cease compensation for damage caused by geese. The criticism is policy-driven, focusing on the negative impact of the ministry's actions on farmers' economies.
2024-07-29
15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu extraordinary session.
The main opponent is the minister who faces distrust, and who is being criticized for his personal political conduct and lack of ethics, stemming from his change of political party and subsequent acquisition of the ministerial portfolio. The criticism is intense, as the speaker demands the minister's resignation in order to close the issue and relieve pressure on the government. The opposition is directed more towards personal credibility than political decisions.
2024-07-29
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The primary criticism is aimed at the government/coalition ("yet another stupid attempt") and officials at the Ministry of Finance. Officials are accused of failing to grasp the actual situation (especially the availability of transport in rural areas) and lacking proper analysis. The opposition is intense, compromise is ruled out, and they are demanding the immediate termination of the bill's proceedings and that it be shelved.
2024-07-22
15th Riigikogu, Riigikogu's extraordinary session.
The main criticism is directed at the actions of the outgoing Minister of Finance, Mart Võrklaev, who is being blamed for the poor state of the nation’s finances and economy. The criticism is sharp and results-oriented, also calling into question the claims made by previous ministers (Pentus-Rosimannus, Akkermann) regarding the soundness of the state’s finances.
2024-07-15
15th Riigikogu, Extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The main opponent is the ruling coalition, which is being criticized for fiscal mismanagement and ramming the bill through. The criticism targets both procedural errors (specifically, the failure to substantively debate the proposed amendments) and political dishonesty. Separately, former finance ministers (Keit Pentus-Rosimannus, Annely Akkermann) are being criticized for spreading pre-election misinformation regarding the state of the nation's finances.
2024-06-19
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, extra plenary sitting
Criticism is aimed at the government's financial management, specifically targeting the financial staff of the Ministry of Finance and the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Communications (MKM), whose work is deemed inadequate. The speaker also challenges attempts to shift responsibility onto other politicians (Reinsalu).
2024-06-10
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The main opponent is the prime minister, who is accused of misrepresenting EKRE's positions, specifically by suggesting that EKRE does not support Ukraine. The criticism is directed at the government's policy, which ignores the problem of corruption in Ukraine and the potential shortage of domestic defense capabilities due to the provision of excessive aid.
2024-06-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The opposition's stance is highly intense, sharply criticizing the Reform Party for breaking its pre-election promises and for improper conduct. The opponents are being accused of slander and dishonesty, particularly in the context of the car tax and child benefits. The criticism targets both the policy itself and the procedural behavior, with no mention of any possibility for compromise.
2024-06-03
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third session, plenary sitting.
The main criticism is directed at the minister and their administrative domain, who are accused of numerous irregularities and failures. The criticism is intense and focuses on administrative errors (e.g., conflicts of interest, data breaches, wasteful spending), with the ultimate goal of initiating a vote of no confidence. The opposition targets both personal conduct (flying business class) and political repercussions (loss of investment).
2024-05-29
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The opposition is aimed at the policies of the Government of the Republic and the minister, specifically criticizing their funding rationale and the shifting of responsibilities onto local municipalities. The criticism is intense, spanning from substantive political points to personally calling a colleague (Jürgen) to order in the chamber when he interrupts. Criticism is also leveled at procedural shortcomings, specifically the committee's failure to address the aspect of food security.
2024-05-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
Criticism is aimed at the potential negative side effects and complexity of EU regulations, comparing them to the CO2 quota system. The opposition focuses on the details of policy implementation and the potential economic burden, rather than specific political opponents.
2024-05-09
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The primary adversaries are the government agencies advocating for e-voting, who stand accused of maintaining silence and ignoring key concerns, alongside the Reform Party, which allegedly supports the status quo purely because of its own political interests. The criticism is intense, centering on procedural matters and the perceived lack of political will, while also highlighting the inadequate cooperation from the Republic's Electoral Committee.
2024-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session.
The primary opposition is directed at the government and a specific rapporteur (Eduard), who is criticized both for the policy (the absence of a bank tax) and the procedure. The criticism is high-intensity, accusing the opposing party of arrogance and casting doubt on the comprehension abilities of Riigikogu members. Compromise is ruled out, with demands for the action to be withdrawn and the matter to be processed anew.
2024-05-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The primary criticism is aimed at the government's executive branch (the minister) responsible for the failed information system. The criticism is intense, focusing on the failure to implement policy, financial waste, and a lack of accountability. Rather than seeking compromise, answers and the taking of responsibility are being demanded.
2024-05-02
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The main confrontation is directed against the current coalition, which is sharply criticized for violating established legislative practices and rushing legislation through ("steamrolling the way they are currently steamrolling"). The criticism targets the procedures, the political style, and the disregard shown toward important interest groups (representatives of large families).
2024-04-30
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Third Session, Plenary Session.
The primary opposition is directed at the policies of the minister and the government, criticizing their justifications concerning pension policy as inadequate. The criticism is policy-based, focusing on the illogicality of social policy and demanding an investigation into alternative areas for savings (NGOs).
2024-04-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The main criticism is aimed at the Ministry of Education and Research, which is being accused of "digging its heels in" and failing to solve the problem. The criticism also extends to the Ministry of Rural Affairs and its officials, who are suspected of being unable to explain the issue in plain Estonian or even grasp its core nature. The criticism targets inaction and procedural inefficiency.
2024-04-10
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The criticism is directed against the government’s policy, which is detrimental to the transport sector, specifically citing the increase in diesel excise duty and the introduction of new road usage fees. It criticizes the institutional delay and two decades of inaction on this issue. Furthermore, it employs an ironic attack against coalition members, calling into question their commitment to integration.
2024-04-09
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The criticism is directed at the actions of the minister and the government, particularly concerning the assurance of data security and the control of bureaucracy. The opposition is policy- and results-based, demanding concrete steps from the government to improve the situation.
2024-04-03
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The criticism is aimed at the Chairman of the Legal Affairs Committee (for the poor working environment and pressuring members) and at officials who are accused of the violent Estonianization of Ukrainian children. The attacks are intense and concern both procedural issues and the setting of political objectives.
2024-04-02
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
The main opponent is the ruling coalition and officials from the Ministry of Finance, who are being criticized both for their policies (tax hikes, ignoring rural areas) and for violating procedural rules. The criticism is intense, accusing the government of being out of touch with reality and demonstrating a poor attitude towards families (referencing the cut to the large family allowance). No willingness to compromise has been expressed; instead, the demand is for the bill to be rejected outright.
2024-04-01
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The main adversary is the prime minister, who is sharply criticized for presenting dishonest and incomplete facts that distort the actual situation. The criticism is aimed at the government's policies (tax hikes, inflation) and their communication methods. No willingness to compromise has been expressed; instead, the government is being demanded to provide a full accounting.
2024-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The main criticism is directed at the government coalition (Reform Party) and the Social Democrats, accusing them of political hypocrisy and misconduct. The criticism is intense, specifically pointing to the withdrawal of child benefits while simultaneously protecting expense compensations for the purpose of personal gain. He/She is skeptical regarding compromise but mentions the possibility of finding consensus if the draft bill is allowed into proceedings.
2024-03-18
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The criticism is aimed at the minister's actions, focusing on procedural deficiencies and ethical questions related to the communication with the Prosecutor General. The attack is intense, demanding clarification on whether the minister was aware that other individuals were also listening to the conversation, which suggests a lack of confidence in the minister's conduct.
2024-03-13
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting.
The primary opposition is directed towards "recent governments," who are criticized for causing economic hardship and chronically underfunding local municipalities. The criticism is intense, focusing on the government's inaction and political choices that have worsened the population's situation.
2024-03-13
15th Estonian Parliament, third sitting, information briefing
The main opponent is the Prime Minister and the government, who are being criticized both for their political decisions (such as burdening local municipalities without providing funding) and for their procedural conduct (namely, failing to answer questions). The criticism is intense, pointing out that the government's actions have driven local authorities into an extremely difficult situation and are now jeopardizing essential front-line services.
2024-03-11
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The primary adversary is the government and the prime minister personally, who is being criticized for causing political discord and instability. The criticism is intense and centers on political decisions, such as cutting family benefits and implementing new taxes. The confrontation is policy-driven, accusing the government of constant reforms that are exhausting the public.
2024-03-07
Fifteenth Riigikogu, third sitting, plenary session
Criticism is directed at the Ministry of Climate, demanding clarity regarding the timeline for implementing nuclear energy and the financing of oil shale reserve storage. The opposition is policy-driven, citing vague plans for ensuring energy security and the conflicting messages circulating in the media.
2024-03-06
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The speaker is clearly an opposition figure, sharply criticizing the coalition and the ministry's stance for rejecting the draft bill. The criticism targets both political short-sightedness and the lack of substantive debate during the handling of the opposition's bill. They accuse the coalition of not truly standing up for everyone's rights, despite their claims.
2024-03-05
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The confrontation is aimed at the prevailing political tendency that promotes the centralization of services and deteriorates the situation for rural residents. The criticism is policy-driven, focusing on negative consequences like the closing of schools and the effect of the motor vehicle tax.
2024-02-21
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The criticism is directed against the government and the prime minister because promises regarding the improvement of capital accessibility for farmers have not been fulfilled, which constitutes a failure of policy. Additionally, the representative leader of the organization is being criticized for attempting to claim the opposite of the reasons behind the farmers' turnout. The criticism is substantive and focuses on inaction and slow reaction times.
2024-02-15
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The criticism is aimed at the Estonian government, which refused to discuss the taxation of banks' windfall profits. The speaker points out that the government’s decision has benefited the banks, while taxpayers and borrowers have borne the burden of rising Euribor rates.
2024-02-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The criticism is aimed at the individuals in the hall who strayed from the topic during the discussion, confusing the issue of labeling with other subjects. Strong opposition is also directed at the hypothetical future scenario where the consumption of insects could be made mandatory.
2024-02-07
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting.
The primary opposition targets the aggression of the Russian Federation and the underlying tolerance for Russian citizens acquiring property in Estonia during wartime. Furthermore, the government's policy is heavily criticized for favoring foreign banks, allowing them to generate high interest rates, while domestic credit unions are being stifled by excessive regulations.
2024-02-05
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary sitting
The main opponent is the government and the prime minister, who are being criticized both for policy issues (the labor market, immigration) and procedural matters (ministerial accountability, failure to provide responses). The criticism is intense and direct, demanding concrete actions.
2024-01-25
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The opposition's stance is directed against the Government of the Republic, criticizing both the transparency in the management of state reserves and the legislative procedures themselves. They particularly sharply criticize the way substantive discussion of opposition bills is avoided using boilerplate responses, demanding an end to the political squabbling. The criticism targets procedural unfairness and a lack of substantive work.
2024-01-24
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The confrontation is directed against the government, which is sharply criticized for creating procedural hurdles in the legislative process. The core of the criticism is that the government dismisses the opposition's draft bills with a formal reply stating that they are already handling the matter themselves—a response that is, in reality, intended to kill the process entirely.
2024-01-22
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The primary criticism is aimed at the Reform Party-led government, which is accused of neglecting road infrastructure construction and reducing the number of cars in the name of the green transition. The criticism is intense, rejecting the "Rail Baltic euphoria" and accusing the government of denying the truth about the project's cost-effectiveness. The opposition focuses on policy and procedure (the failure of land acquisition).
2024-01-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The speaker is clearly positioned in the opposition, criticizing the minister's vague response and faulting the coalition for its lack of interest in the discussion. The criticism targets both the government's procedural conduct and its economic policy, specifically citing negative "tax hikes." He/She employs irony to underscore the government's incompetence or lack of clarity.
2024-01-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The criticism is directed both at those who hesitated regarding the relocation of the monument and at institutions that allow legal proceedings to become a method for punishing political opponents. Separately, the Ministry of Justice’s arguments concerning conflicts of interest are challenged, highlighting the contradiction with the practice of the shared location of the prosecutor’s office and judges.
2024-01-11
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The primary criticism is aimed at the coalition, the government, and the Ministry of Social Affairs, who are accused of having an ideological problem and an unwillingness to substantively solve a serious social issue. The criticism is intense and politically charged, citing the coalition’s first move to cut child benefits.
2024-01-10
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The primary confrontation is aimed at the Reform Party and its long-standing member, who is being directly addressed with questions in their capacity as the committee chairman. The criticism targets both the legislative procedure and the historical unfairness inherent in tax policy (specifically VAT), thereby calling into question whether previous promises have been fulfilled.
2024-01-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session.
The primary conflict is with the government, particularly the Ministry of Climate and the Ministry of Regional Affairs and Agriculture, criticizing their failure to reconsider the Green Transition policy. The criticism is policy- and performance-based, accusing the CO2 quota system of driving industry out of Europe. Furthermore, the previous composition of the Riigikogu is criticized for its decision to tax wood-fired boiler houses.