By Plenary Sessions: Rene Kokk

The primary criticism is aimed at the submitters of the draft bill (the Minister/Ministry), who are accused of poor legislative drafting, the pretense of inclusion, and unjustified rushing. The criticism is intense and focuses on both procedural flaws (urgency) and substantive issues (disregard for client safety). The overemphasis on the interests of businesses over those of the client is also subject to criticism.

The main opponent is the minister who submitted the amendments to the Planning Act, criticizing them on both procedural and substantive grounds. The criticism is intense and uncompromising, calling points in the draft bill "utterly ridiculous" and accusing the minister of doing the exact opposite of what he had said.

The main opponent is the Reform Party and the government, who are directly blamed for causing the poor economic situation and the low quality of budget planning. The criticism is intense and focuses on procedural and political failures, particularly the massive volume of budget reallocations. The speaker rejects the minister's attempt to criticize the Institute of Economic Research, redirecting the blame back to the ruling party.