By Plenary Sessions: Rene Kokk

The style is critical and at times combative, accusing the ministry of relying on slogans and engaging in poor legislative practice. The text employs both logical questions (e.g., how does removing the image improve the system?) and emotional appeals, referencing clients' desire for security. The politician uses sharp language, such as "very poor legislative practice" and "we only involve stakeholders so we can claim that we involve them."

The speaker's rhetorical style is sharp, critical, and confrontational, utilizing strong language such as "a very bad law" and "completely absurd." The appeals are directed at logic, demanding the minister justify how less involvement is somehow better, but this is delivered with great intensity. He/She also calls on journalists to press the minister for answers.

The rhetorical style is critical and data-driven, relying on significant financial indicators to prove the poor quality of budget planning. The metaphor "beating the messenger" is used to criticize the government and emphasize accountability. The tone is formal, questioning, and demanding, stressing logical argumentation.