By Plenary Sessions: Rene Kokk

The opposition is aimed at the policies of the Government of the Republic and the minister, specifically criticizing their funding rationale and the shifting of responsibilities onto local municipalities. The criticism is intense, spanning from substantive political points to personally calling a colleague (Jürgen) to order in the chamber when he interrupts. Criticism is also leveled at procedural shortcomings, specifically the committee's failure to address the aspect of food security.

Criticism is aimed at the potential negative side effects and complexity of EU regulations, comparing them to the CO2 quota system. The opposition focuses on the details of policy implementation and the potential economic burden, rather than specific political opponents.

The primary adversaries are the government agencies advocating for e-voting, who stand accused of maintaining silence and ignoring key concerns, alongside the Reform Party, which allegedly supports the status quo purely because of its own political interests. The criticism is intense, centering on procedural matters and the perceived lack of political will, while also highlighting the inadequate cooperation from the Republic's Electoral Committee.

The primary opposition is directed at the government and a specific rapporteur (Eduard), who is criticized both for the policy (the absence of a bank tax) and the procedure. The criticism is high-intensity, accusing the opposing party of arrogance and casting doubt on the comprehension abilities of Riigikogu members. Compromise is ruled out, with demands for the action to be withdrawn and the matter to be processed anew.

The primary criticism is aimed at the government's executive branch (the minister) responsible for the failed information system. The criticism is intense, focusing on the failure to implement policy, financial waste, and a lack of accountability. Rather than seeking compromise, answers and the taking of responsibility are being demanded.

The main confrontation is directed against the current coalition, which is sharply criticized for violating established legislative practices and rushing legislation through ("steamrolling the way they are currently steamrolling"). The criticism targets the procedures, the political style, and the disregard shown toward important interest groups (representatives of large families).