By Plenary Sessions: Rene Kokk

The criticism is directed against the government and the prime minister because promises regarding the improvement of capital accessibility for farmers have not been fulfilled, which constitutes a failure of policy. Additionally, the representative leader of the organization is being criticized for attempting to claim the opposite of the reasons behind the farmers' turnout. The criticism is substantive and focuses on inaction and slow reaction times.

The criticism is aimed at the Estonian government, which refused to discuss the taxation of banks' windfall profits. The speaker points out that the government’s decision has benefited the banks, while taxpayers and borrowers have borne the burden of rising Euribor rates.

The criticism is aimed at the individuals in the hall who strayed from the topic during the discussion, confusing the issue of labeling with other subjects. Strong opposition is also directed at the hypothetical future scenario where the consumption of insects could be made mandatory.

The primary opposition targets the aggression of the Russian Federation and the underlying tolerance for Russian citizens acquiring property in Estonia during wartime. Furthermore, the government's policy is heavily criticized for favoring foreign banks, allowing them to generate high interest rates, while domestic credit unions are being stifled by excessive regulations.

The main opponent is the government and the prime minister, who are being criticized both for policy issues (the labor market, immigration) and procedural matters (ministerial accountability, failure to provide responses). The criticism is intense and direct, demanding concrete actions.