By Plenary Sessions: Rene Kokk

The tone of the speech is anxious and urgent, emphasizing that the agricultural sector is "in deep, deep trouble" and highlighting the severe financial pressure faced by people due to inflation. The style is formal, addressing the presiding officer and the rapporteur, and relies on logical arguments (cause-and-effect relationships in the economy) and rhetorical questions to affirm the necessity of the draft bill.

The rhetorical style is analytical and inquisitive, utilizing the example of Lithuania to illustrate the repercussions of political choices. The speaker presents their viewpoint within the formal environment of the Riigikogu, concentrating on logical arguments and the outcomes of the policy in order to substantiate their critical position.

The style is initially polite and appreciative (thanking the farmers and Henn), but quickly shifts to being concerned and cautionary. A powerful rhetorical question is employed, emphasizing the slippery slope argument and the fear scenario (mandatory eating) to underscore the urgency of the issue. The tone is formal, yet emotionally charged.

The speaker employs a style that is formal and well-reasoned, yet simultaneously insistent and principled, relying heavily on logical appeals and statistical data. Comparisons are utilized (such as the sanctioning of athletes) to substantiate the viewpoint. When the topic shifts to foreign banks, the tone turns sharply critical, employing rhetorical questions and phrases like "they fleece people mercilessly."

The tone is critical, demanding, and slightly confrontational, especially when addressing the Prime Minister, emphasizing his accountability for the actions of other ministers. Direct questions are employed, and there is a reference to previous unanswered inquiries, which lends a sharp edge to the style. The appeals are grounded in facts (the number of unemployed) and political procedure (responsibility).