By Years: Ando Kiviberg

The rhetoric is often patriotic and insistent, emphasizing Estonian values and security threats. He employs a sharp, sometimes confrontational tone when criticizing opponents, labeling the political debate "low-quality folk theater" and a "farce." The style is formal but includes strong emotional and historical appeals, especially in anti-Kremlin speeches, and he sharply criticizes the "spouting of nonsense."

The style is predominantly formal and analytical, particularly in committee reports, but shifts to passionate and historically charged when discussing security issues and addressing the privileges of colonizers. The speaker employs rhetorical questions and personal anecdotes (Viljandi, the apple) and demonstrates concern for proper language usage, often correcting other members of the Riigikogu. The overall tone is professional yet critical, stressing the urgent need for action.