By Plenary Sessions: Ando Kiviberg

The main criticism is aimed at the coalition partners, the Social Democrats, who are being urged to find the courage to side with the opinion of the overwhelming majority of the Riigikogu. The criticism is political and concerns the lack of agreement regarding the revocation of voting rights for stateless persons. The standoff is intense because it prevents a full reckoning on the security issue.

Insufficient data

The main opponents are "silver-tongued individuals" who claim that the state's steps to secure the constitutional order are unlawful, along with forces supporting the activities of the Moscow Patriarchate. The criticism is intense and substantive, accusing the opponents of offering support to the Kremlin's imperialist aggression and knowingly endangering the constitutional order. The speaker sharply rejects claims regarding the restriction of religious freedom, labeling them the spreading of falsehoods.

The confrontation is directed at the political procedure, criticizing the issue of the Prime Minister's no-confidence motion as low-quality political theater. Strong criticism is also aimed at the embarrassing handling of previous state embezzlement cases (Tallinn Port) and the simple act of letting things slide, demanding stricter proceedings in the future.

The criticism is directed at a recent political move by the new US presidential administration: specifically, ending the tracking of Russian oligarchs' assets and shifting the focus instead to Mexican drug cartels. The criticism is policy-based and centers on the potential negative effect this step could have on war financing.