By Plenary Sessions: Signe Kivi

There is no direct opposition; the speaker neutrally addresses previous hesitations regarding the amendment of the Cultural Endowment Act, but does not criticize any specific opposing party. The focus is on presenting solutions, not on confrontation.

The criticism is aimed at the failure to consider the Ministry of Culture's proposals on the coordination sheet, and more broadly, at the government's taxation policy, which creates unequal conditions. The opposition is policy-based, centering on how this taxation harms owners and restorers of vintage vehicles. The confrontation is of moderate intensity, presented in the form of a question.

Insufficient Data. (The address does not contain criticism or opposing viewpoints, but is aimed at obtaining clarifications and assurances from the government.)

The opposition is focused on the speed at which the changes proposed by the bill's submitter would take effect, a timeline considered too rapid for the universities. The criticism is both procedural and policy-based, calling into question the necessity of repeatedly submitting the draft legislation.