By Plenary Sessions: Signe Kivi

The style of the speech is formal, informative, and highly detailed, focusing on explaining the history and preparation process behind the legal amendments. It utilizes logical arguments and fact-based justification (e.g., growth in tax revenue and the size of reserves), deliberately avoiding emotional appeals. The initial request for three additional minutes indicates a desire to provide a comprehensive and exhaustive overview.

The rhetorical style is formal and concerned, emphasizing the seriousness of the problem ("a genuinely serious problem") and its potential negative consequences. The speaker relies on logical arguments and directly quotes letters from interest groups to lend weight to their criticism. The presentation is structured as a direct question to the minister, demanding a clear answer regarding the Ministry of Culture's proposals.

The style of the address is formal and interrogative, speaking directly to the Minister in a respectful tone. Logical argumentation is employed, relying on specific financial and demographic data to underscore the significance of the issue. Emotional appeals are absent; the focus is strictly on facts and the responsibility of the state.

The rhetorical style is formal and respectful, employing the addresses "Honored Chairman" and "Respected Presenter." The speech is logical and focuses on a procedural challenge, raising a pointed question about the frequency of the draft bill's previous defense.