By Plenary Sessions: Signe Kivi

Economic perspectives support the strategic use of the state budget, directing the revenue from raised taxes (gambling tax, excises) towards the development of culture and the creation of social guarantees. Fiscal correction is supported to ensure the efficient funding of lecturers' scholarships following the tax increase (the change in rates from 3.8% to 2%).

The speaker is opposed to taxation that creates an uneven playing field and hinders long-term investments (restoration). The economic perspective supports tax incentives for special interest groups (owners of vintage vehicles) to prevent assets from leaving the country and to avoid penalizing restoration processes with a tax burden.

The economic perspective advocates for using state budgetary resources to support soft foreign policy and cultural objectives. This position necessitates a state contribution to cover the funding deficit of the Toronto center, thereby demonstrating a willingness to allocate funds toward supporting the diaspora.

Data is scarce.