By Months: Signe Kivi
Total Months: 9
Fully Profiled: 9
11.2024
8 Speeches
There is no direct opposition; the criticism is instead aimed at procedural and structural issues, such as the insufficient thoroughness of the budget submission. The speaker also factually points out that members of the Centre Party faction are absent from the work of the environmental committee, which prevents their voices from being heard. The attacks are policy-driven and procedural.
10.2024
5 Speeches
He/She takes a stand against those who criticize the Reform Party and insult the women, mothers, and grandmothers within their parliamentary group, considering the attack unjust. The criticism is also aimed at policies that prioritize the distribution of money over genuinely family-friendly services.
09.2024
2 Speeches
Not enough data.
06.2024
1 Speeches
There are no direct adversaries or criticized groups; this is rather a case of institutional oversight where answers are required from the management of the Bank of Estonia.
05.2024
6 Speeches
The criticism is aimed at the Ministry of Education and Research concerning the delay in amending the Language Act and the rejection of the draft bill, even though the ministry's efforts in transitioning to Estonian-language education are acknowledged. He/She disputes the heritage and nature conservation restrictions that are preventing the Estonia extension, arguing that these problems are meant to be solved and compromises found.
04.2024
3 Speeches
He/She does not directly criticize the opposing side, but instead questions the rigidity of the bill (initiated by EKRE), seeking a more flexible political solution that would allow for selective translation when necessary. His/Her criticism is aimed at the bill's excessive inflexibility, rather than its ultimate objective.
03.2024
5 Speeches
The direct confrontation is evident in the criticism leveled at the Reform Party faction regarding the declining birth rate—a claim the politician personally denies. He focuses instead on defending the procedural choices made to avoid infringing upon the rights of those who submitted rejected projects, rather than directly attacking the policies of his opponents.
02.2024
5 Speeches
The criticism is directed primarily against the government's policies and ministerial decisions, such as the speed of implementing the higher education act and the disregard for the Ministry of Culture's proposals (tax exemption for vintage vehicles). The criticism is policy-based and focuses on procedural accountability.
01.2024
3 Speeches
There is no direct confrontation or personal criticism. The criticism is aimed instead at the timing of the bill initiators' proposal and the narrow focus on dealing with Soviet symbols, questioning whether addressing that specific statue is still necessary.