By Months: Signe Kivi

Total Months: 14

Fully Profiled: 14

All Categories Political Position Topic Expertise Rhetorical Style Activity Patterns Opposition Stance Collaboration Style Regional Focus Economic Views Social Issues Legislative Focus
10.2025

1 Speeches

The criticism is directed at the current administrative structure, where responsibility is fragmented between two ministries, thereby hindering the effective implementation of language policy. This is procedural and policy-based criticism that necessitates a structural change to consolidate accountability.
Details View Details
09.2025

2 Speeches

The criticism is directed at the ambiguity of the draft bill concerning restrictions on religious associations and their foreign ties. The opposition is both procedural and political, emphasizing that the law's implementer would be required to define the general requirements themselves, which runs counter to the requirement for clarity when restricting fundamental rights.
Details View Details
06.2025

3 Speeches

No direct conflict is expressed, but the speaker raises doubts about the bill’s effect on the status of unqualified teachers. The criticism is based on the consequences of the policy, not personal attacks, and is aimed at eliciting a response from the minister and sharing these concerns.
Details View Details
04.2025

2 Speeches

The criticism is aimed at the rapporteurs of the draft legislation (due to a lack of transparency) and the Ministry of Culture. The opposition is intense and centers on procedural infringements, particularly the failure to adhere to agreements and the submission of an unofficial document to UNESCO, which resulted in negative feedback.
Details View Details
02.2025

1 Speeches

No direct political confrontation is articulated, but criticism is aimed at individuals with undetermined citizenship whose attitudes and values differ from those of Estonian citizens. The criticism targets the failure to share values and security priorities.
Details View Details
11.2024

8 Speeches

There is no direct opposition; the criticism is instead aimed at procedural and structural issues, such as the insufficient thoroughness of the budget submission. The speaker also factually points out that members of the Centre Party faction are absent from the work of the environmental committee, which prevents their voices from being heard. The attacks are policy-driven and procedural.
Details View Details
10.2024

5 Speeches

He/She takes a stand against those who criticize the Reform Party and insult the women, mothers, and grandmothers within their parliamentary group, considering the attack unjust. The criticism is also aimed at policies that prioritize the distribution of money over genuinely family-friendly services.
Details View Details
09.2024

2 Speeches

Not enough data.
Details View Details
06.2024

1 Speeches

There are no direct adversaries or criticized groups; this is rather a case of institutional oversight where answers are required from the management of the Bank of Estonia.
Details View Details
05.2024

6 Speeches

The criticism is aimed at the Ministry of Education and Research concerning the delay in amending the Language Act and the rejection of the draft bill, even though the ministry's efforts in transitioning to Estonian-language education are acknowledged. He/She disputes the heritage and nature conservation restrictions that are preventing the Estonia extension, arguing that these problems are meant to be solved and compromises found.
Details View Details
04.2024

3 Speeches

He/She does not directly criticize the opposing side, but instead questions the rigidity of the bill (initiated by EKRE), seeking a more flexible political solution that would allow for selective translation when necessary. His/Her criticism is aimed at the bill's excessive inflexibility, rather than its ultimate objective.
Details View Details
03.2024

5 Speeches

The direct confrontation is evident in the criticism leveled at the Reform Party faction regarding the declining birth rate—a claim the politician personally denies. He focuses instead on defending the procedural choices made to avoid infringing upon the rights of those who submitted rejected projects, rather than directly attacking the policies of his opponents.
Details View Details
02.2024

5 Speeches

The criticism is directed primarily against the government's policies and ministerial decisions, such as the speed of implementing the higher education act and the disregard for the Ministry of Culture's proposals (tax exemption for vintage vehicles). The criticism is policy-based and focuses on procedural accountability.
Details View Details
01.2024

3 Speeches

There is no direct confrontation or personal criticism. The criticism is aimed instead at the timing of the bill initiators' proposal and the narrow focus on dealing with Soviet symbols, questioning whether addressing that specific statue is still necessary.
Details View Details
Back to Profiling