By Plenary Sessions: Tanel Kiik

The speaker employs a question-driven, analytical approach, addressing the audience politely using the formal salutations "lugupeetud" (respected) and "austatud" (honored). The rhetoric is fact-based and detailed, utilizing specific figures (18% vs 8% impact on different income brackets) and comparative analysis. The tone is critical yet professional, expressing direct opposition to the government's policy through logical arguments and European-style comparisons.

Adopts a critical yet constructive tone, asking specific questions regarding environmental policy. Highlights inconsistencies between the government's actions and its promises. Maintains a professional approach, focusing on facts and policy consistency.

The speaking style is polite and constructive, beginning with an expression of gratitude to the minister. It employs logical argumentation, highlighting specific concerns and questions regarding the future. The overall tone is cooperative rather than confrontational, focusing on the search for solutions.

The speaker employs formally polite yet sharply critical rhetoric, repeatedly stressing the phrases "in our assessment" and "we see" to underscore the collective position. The style is argumentative and data-driven, utilizing specific figures and statistics (such as comparisons of the gender composition of the parliamentary groups). The criticism directed at the current coalition's "poor political culture" and "backroom decision-making" is particularly emotionally charged.

Employs a direct and occasionally confrontational tone, asking pointed questions about gun policy. Cites specific tragic examples (the Lihula shooting, the Viljandi school incident) to illustrate their viewpoint. Maintains an argumentative structure, but utilizes emotional appeals.

He combined his personal experience as a minister with evidence-based arguments. He adopted an emotional approach when dealing with the Pihlakodu case, while simultaneously maintaining a professional tone.

They employ a polite and constructive approach, starting with respectful forms of address. The communication relies on facts and data, but simultaneously expresses clear concern and a personal viewpoint ("I personally consider this very dangerous"). It concludes with a specific question, seeking practical solutions.

The speaker consistently employs a combative and accusatory tone, posing sharp questions regarding government policy. The rhetoric is emotionally charged, utilizing phrases such as "lying to the people" and "oligopolistic market," yet it simultaneously relies on concrete facts and examples. The speaker demonstrates good parliamentary etiquette, always respectfully addressing individuals as "Honorable Minister" and "Esteemed Chairman," but the content is clearly oppositional in nature.