By Plenary Sessions: Raimond Kaljulaid

The resistance is aimed at the actions of the government and the minister, specifically criticizing the organization of the land planning process and the volatility of environmental policy. The criticism is directed at political instability, which harms the investment environment, and the loss of trust in the state. The criticism is policy- and procedure-based.

The speaker criticizes the current state of the debate, calling it one-sided and absurd. He is pushing back against those who, in his estimation, are expanding the scope of the draft legislation to encompass unreasonable topics, aiming to steer the discussion back toward the facts.

The primary criticism is aimed at the Minister of Defense and the Ministry of Defense, who are accused of unacceptable procedural delays in approving implementing acts. The criticism is performance-based and is escalating into a demand for the minister's dismissal ("red card"). The Prime Minister is indirectly accused, the implication being that the Ministry of Defense has let him down through its inaction.

The primary criticism targets the reforms initiated by the Reform Party and the government, which are widely seen as detrimental to the situation of workers. Opponents' motives are under suspicion, with suggestions that they are pursuing the wrong course of action, either due to ignorance or "in the interests of their sponsors." The criticism is rooted in policy and values, challenging the Reform Party's previous arguments.