By Months: Raimond Kaljulaid

The speaker demonstrates expertise in the procedures for processing the state budget and in transparency requirements, while criticizing the lack of clarity regarding the section pertaining to education. Also evident is knowledge of the administrative division of the education sector (state vs. local government) and the mechanisms for assessing international reputation in connection with security policy decisions.

The speaker demonstrates profound expertise in the field of national defense and security, being a member of the National Defense Committee and meticulously addressing the inventorying of reserves, advance payments, and procurement policy. He is also competent on the topic of regional development and economic indicators, demanding specific metrics and figures from ministers instead of emotional assessments. Furthermore, he is well-versed in the details of tax policy, referencing the gains and losses across various deciles.

The speaker demonstrates expertise regarding the internal rules and legislative procedures of the Riigikogu, detailing the handling of bills, the third reading, and the role of the Board. Particular emphasis is placed on their knowledge of state secrets legislation and the oversight mechanisms for security agencies. They point out contradictions within the law and are fully aware of how the legislative process proceeds.

The speaker demonstrates detailed awareness of legislative procedures, especially the deadlines for implementing acts within the context of the Weapons Act, highlighting specific delay periods (133 days). Furthermore, they reference a study by Tallinn University of Technology regarding the negative consequences of platform work and are knowledgeable about regional infrastructure projects (the Läänemaa health path) and the impact of wind energy on national defense weaponry.

The speaker demonstrates expertise in national defense, maritime security, and strategic geography, highlighting Estonia's critical reliance on sea lines of communication and the inherent vulnerability of the Suwałki Gap. They employ specific terminology when discussing the rights of the Estonian Defence Forces, naval capabilities, and the fulfillment of NATO objectives. They emphasize that the risk being mitigated is tangible and genuinely exists.

The speaker demonstrates expertise in internal government procedures and security requirements (NATO clearances), referencing specific instances from cabinet meetings. Furthermore, they are knowledgeable about potential solutions for managing the defense sector and rebuilding public trust, citing the name of the Secretary-General of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs as an example. A quote from a former prime minister is used to reinforce the arguments.

The speaker demonstrates deep expertise in the foreign policy of Estonia's recent history, referring to specific events and statesmen in the 1990s, including Meri's diplomacy and Nordic support. On the topic of dangerous dogs, he relies on thorough preparatory work, utilizing statistics from the Police and Border Guard Board (PPA) (approximately 600 call-outs per year) and referencing the positions of the Chancellor of Justice and the provisions of the Law Enforcement Act.

The text demonstrates a profound understanding of national defense, the history of defense spending, and civil protection. It utilizes specific data points (GDP percentages, the years 2012–2014, and comparisons of defense procurement volumes) and references the fundamentals of security policy and NATO summit agreements. It stresses the importance of developing civil protection, highlighting the value of learning from the experiences of others, such as Finland.