By Plenary Sessions: Maria Jufereva-Skuratovski

The speaker directly criticizes two colleagues: Riina Solman, for factual inaccuracy regarding the flags in Lasnamäe, and Henn Põlluaas, for his ideological position. The criticism directed at Põlluaas is intense and value-driven, as the speaker believes that nation-based control and a lack of trust are detrimental to the state.

There are no direct attacks against opponents or the targets of criticism. The second speaker asks for clarification regarding procedural failures (the amendment of the statutes/bylaws), but this is seeking information, not confrontation.

The main criticism is directed at the Centre Party, whose draft bill is being called populist, lacking in analysis, and short-sighted. The criticism is political and motivation-based, arguing that the bill was created as a simple and appealing, yet ultimately harmful, idea aimed at taking money from the rich. Furthermore, the opposition is criticized for its attendance patterns in the chamber and its apparent lack of interest in the debate.

The criticism is directed at those European Union member states that neither acknowledge the risks stemming from Russia's aggression nor contribute sufficiently to defense. This is policy-based criticism regarding the failure to fulfill collective obligations, which could have negative consequences.