By Plenary Sessions: Aleksei Jevgrafov

The style of the address is formal, analytical, and interrogative, directed toward the presiding officer and the minister. Emphasis is placed on logical appeal and the comparison of data to highlight the discrepancy between the minister's claims and official figures. The tone is direct and demands an explanation that corresponds to the facts.

The rhetorical style is polite and focused on questions, respectfully addressing the session chair and colleagues ("Dear Vadim!", "Respected Vadim!"). A balance is maintained between citing official data (a logical appeal) and expressing concern regarding children's health and the future of the country. The tone is serious and demanding, particularly when addressing the issue of school lunch funding.

The style is formal and respectful (using salutations such as "Esteemed Minister"), yet simultaneously critical and urgent concerning the policy's consequences. It employs logical argumentation, contrasting the stagnation of the subsistence level with rising prices and minimum wage increases. Strong language is used to underscore the gravity of the situation ("quite complicated," "impossible").

The rhetorical style is formal and respectful (addressing the chairman and the minister), but it includes a sharp, personal political remark concerning the minister's changing party affiliation ("Now you are red, previously you were green"). The questions themselves are direct, focusing on logical argumentation and political accountability.

The rhetorical style is critical and forceful, presenting direct questions and challenging the minister's priorities. The speaker employs logical arguments (the length of queues, bus arrivals) and emotional contrast, pitting the minister's security focus ("Russia") against the daily life issues faced by the public ("people"). Quotes and examples drawn from social media are also utilized to lend credibility to the claims.

The speaker's style is polite and inquisitive, addressing the colleague directly and respectfully ("Esteemed Vadim!", "Dear Vadim!"). The emphasis is on logic and information gathering, asking specific questions regarding economic impact and comparative statistics. The tone is neutral and professional.

The tone is critical and inquisitive, presenting a direct challenge to the Prime Minister regarding the normalcy of the situation. It employs logical argumentation (lack of qualification equates to low-quality education) and relies on media reports as the foundation for its position. The style is formal and accusatory.