By Plenary Sessions: Jüri Jaanson

The style of the speech is formal, persuasive, and highly argumentative, focusing on logical and procedural justifications for the necessity of the draft legislation. Opponents (Isamaa) are criticized, but the tone is primarily analytical, aiming to demonstrate that their opposition falls outside the framework of the bill. Repetitive strategic key points (reducing bureaucracy, efficiency) are utilized for persuasion.

The style is formal, respectful (addressing the Minister), and analytical. The speaker employs logical argumentation, raising critical questions concerning the specifics of the draft legislation's implementation, to ensure its intended purpose and prevent misuse.

The style is formal and analytical, focusing on logical arguments and questions regarding the substantive meaning of the proposal. The tone is generally respectful ("Esteemed Session Chair," "Dear Presenter"), but in the second address, there is a slight hint of irony directed toward the presenter when a procedural matter is addressed. The speaker utilizes questions to underscore their position.

The style is formal, procedural, and analytical, focusing on the summation of the commission's work, legal arguments, and procedural decisions. The appeal is primarily logical and fact-based, referencing stakeholder discussions and voting results. The speaker is defensive regarding criticism from opponents, stressing that technical details fall within the scope of a subordinate act (a ministerial regulation).

The rhetorical style is formal and interrogative, addressing the Prime Minister directly during the plenary session. An analytical tone is employed, emphasizing the long-term nature of the problem and utilizing the metaphor of the "magic wand" to highlight the absence of simple solutions.

The style is formal, respectful, and analytical, commencing with an expression of gratitude to the Prime Minister for the substantive presentation. Logical argumentation is employed, emphasizing the importance of economic growth and raising clarifying questions regarding the efficiency of the government's work.

The style is formal and analytical, focusing on addressing questions to the presenter, utilizing the salutations "Esteemed Presenter" and "Dear Session Chair." A logical appeal is employed, questioning the commission's objective and practical outcome, while also referencing the temporal shift in the validity of the decisions.