By Plenary Sessions: Jüri Jaanson
Total Sessions: 38
Fully Profiled: 38
2025-10-16
XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
The style is polite and respectful, addressing the chair of the session and the rapporteur deferentially. The speaker employs logical argumentation to justify the necessity of the value-added tax (VAT) for maintaining the state and resolving social issues. The tone is persuasive and constructive, presenting their position in the form of a question.
2025-10-09
15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The style is formal and respectful toward the presenter, yet simultaneously analytical and inquisitive. The speaker calls the presentation's thoroughness into question, labeling it a "very good sales presentation" and demanding a description of the actual problems. The emphasis is on logical and policy-related questions.
2025-10-08
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The style is formal and respectful, addressing the presiding officer and the minister directly. The rhetoric is analytical and question-driven, focusing on the government's lack of future vision regarding asset protection. Moderately evaluative language ("more than strange") is employed to describe the foreign court's ruling.
2025-10-07
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The style is formal and initially complimentary, referring to the minister as a "top-tier politician" and commending their work in finalizing the budget. This is followed by a logical, policy-centric question concerning budget equilibrium and the sustainability of culture and sports, maintaining a constructive tone throughout.
2025-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 6th sitting, plenary session
The rhetorical style is combative and sharp, aimed at a direct counter-attack and the substantive reversal of the opponent’s words. The speaker uses a logical argument (that blindness and deafness are not hindering values) to neutralize the emotional attack, concluding with an accusation of the opposition’s incompetence.
2025-09-16
Fifteenth Riigikogu, sixth sitting, plenary sitting.
The style is formal, respectful, and analytical, addressing the Vice-Chairman of the Riigikogu and the Chancellor of Justice. The discourse is logical and focuses on requesting specific data and clarifications regarding the development and problem areas of accessibility. Emotional appeals or personal attacks are not employed.
2025-09-04
15th Riigikogu, extraordinary session of the Riigikogu
The rhetorical style is formal, direct, and inquisitive, focusing on logical and procedural arguments. The tone is analytical and slightly skeptical, particularly when addressing procedural delays or a lack of schedule transparency. Emotional appeals are not utilized; the emphasis is placed on demanding information.
2025-06-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The style is formal and analytical, focusing on logical explanation and procedural correctness. The speaker is persistent, repeating the question until a response is obtained, and issues a direct challenge to the session chairman regarding the interpretation of the Riigikogu Rules of Procedure. Appeals are aimed at the precision of the legal text and the fair application of the session rules.
2025-06-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting.
The rhetorical style is highly formal, polite, and respectful, addressing the presiding officer of the session and the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court directly. A logical and direct format is used for posing questions, aimed at obtaining clarification and information. The tone is professional and appreciative ("I thank you, of course, very much for the thorough presentation").
2025-06-04
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The style is predominantly formal, businesslike, and procedural, especially when presenting the committee report, where the conveyance of procedural decisions and ministry positions dominates. He/She presents his/her views through logical arguments and facts, relying on the credibility of institutions (the Health Board). A brief procedural protest is lodged with the session chair regarding an error in the microphone usage system.
2025-05-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The rhetorical style is formal, analytical, and investigative, addressing the Chairman of the Session and the Minister respectfully. The speaker employs logical argumentation, posing structured questions to gain clarity regarding the bill's impact and cost, while eschewing emotional appeals.
2025-05-14
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session
The rhetorical style is formal and directly confrontational, posing a sharp question to the presenter regarding their stance. The appeal is strongly logical, relying on a scientific distinction and requiring a clear position on the viability of carbon quotas. The tone is analytical and demanding.
2025-04-24
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The rhetorical style is formal, direct, and grounded in logic, employing deductive reasoning to underscore the medical community's duty to protest ("My logic dictates..."). The tone is probing and demanding, focusing on questions that expose institutional inaction in the face of serious health threats.
2025-04-23
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The rhetorical style is formal, respectful, and inquisitive, addressing both the session chairman and the minister. The speaker poses direct and technical questions to ascertain the differences in the law's implementation before and after its adoption, relying on logical clarity.
2025-04-22
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The style is formal and critical, beginning with a polite thank you for the Minister's presentation, but then clearly expressing disappointment regarding the procedure. Logical arguments are employed, listing specific policy issues to emphasize the necessity of a separate discussion. The tone is concerned and demanding, focusing on factual shortcomings.
2025-04-08
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The style is formal, involving respectful address toward the presiding officer of the session and the Minister. A logical and analytical approach is employed, with the question being presented only after the necessary background (specifically, sports examples) has been introduced. The tone is direct and aims primarily at achieving clarity.
2025-03-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The style of the speech is formal, persuasive, and highly argumentative, focusing on logical and procedural justifications for the necessity of the draft legislation. Opponents (Isamaa) are criticized, but the tone is primarily analytical, aiming to demonstrate that their opposition falls outside the framework of the bill. Repetitive strategic key points (reducing bureaucracy, efficiency) are utilized for persuasion.
2025-03-25
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The style is formal, respectful (addressing the Minister), and analytical. The speaker employs logical argumentation, raising critical questions concerning the specifics of the draft legislation's implementation, to ensure its intended purpose and prevent misuse.
2025-03-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The style is formal and analytical, focusing on logical arguments and questions regarding the substantive meaning of the proposal. The tone is generally respectful ("Esteemed Session Chair," "Dear Presenter"), but in the second address, there is a slight hint of irony directed toward the presenter when a procedural matter is addressed. The speaker utilizes questions to underscore their position.
2025-03-19
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The style is formal, procedural, and analytical, focusing on the summation of the commission's work, legal arguments, and procedural decisions. The appeal is primarily logical and fact-based, referencing stakeholder discussions and voting results. The speaker is defensive regarding criticism from opponents, stressing that technical details fall within the scope of a subordinate act (a ministerial regulation).
2025-03-17
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The rhetorical style is formal and interrogative, addressing the Prime Minister directly during the plenary session. An analytical tone is employed, emphasizing the long-term nature of the problem and utilizing the metaphor of the "magic wand" to highlight the absence of simple solutions.
2025-03-11
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The style is formal, respectful, and analytical, commencing with an expression of gratitude to the Prime Minister for the substantive presentation. Logical argumentation is employed, emphasizing the importance of economic growth and raising clarifying questions regarding the efficiency of the government's work.
2025-03-10
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
The style is formal and analytical, focusing on addressing questions to the presenter, utilizing the salutations "Esteemed Presenter" and "Dear Session Chair." A logical appeal is employed, questioning the commission's objective and practical outcome, while also referencing the temporal shift in the validity of the decisions.
2025-02-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session.
The speaking style is analytical and formal, balancing concerns about children's movement and safety with the search for political solutions. Specific examples (Tuuli Tomingas, Pirita ski track) are used to illustrate the arguments, highlighting the relationship between the athlete's determination and the state's supportive function. The tone is generally concerned, particularly regarding the safety of movement and the high dropout rate among children, but it offers constructive solutions.
2025-02-19
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary sitting
The style is formal and inquiry-based, addressing the minister directly during a plenary session. The tone is concerned and emphasizes the perspective of security (safety and systemic security), utilizing logical argumentation on the topic of limitations in international law.
2025-01-30
Fifteenth Estonian Parliament, fifth session, plenary session.
The speaker's style is formal and polite, utilizing the salutations "Esteemed Chair of the Session" and "Dear Presenter." The rhetoric is primarily analytical and inquisitive, aiming to expand the discussion beyond the initial draft. The tone is neutral and focuses on the logical examination of policy.
2025-01-29
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
The rhetorical style is formal, respectful, and focuses on clarification, addressing the presiding officer and the minister respectfully. The speaker asks direct and detailed questions to ensure clarity regarding the implementation of the law. A logical and policy-centric approach is employed, devoid of emotional appeals.
2024-12-12
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The rhetoric is formal and inquisitive, respectfully addressing the session chairman and the minister. The style is logical and focuses on data (budget, costs), posing a clear and direct question regarding the budget accounting.
2024-12-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The style is predominantly formal, analytical, and informative, especially when introducing the draft law, where a fact-based overview of the committee's work is central. In procedural matters, the tone is corrective and resolute, employing figurative language (e.g., "shooting questions like a machine gun") to call a colleague to order.
2024-12-04
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary sitting
The rhetorical style is formal and centered on questions, addressed to the session chair and the rapporteur. The tone is businesslike and neutral, with the aim of clarifying the substance of the National Defence Committee's discussions. When posing a question, a logical structure is adhered to, referencing previously published information and the questions raised by colleagues.
2024-11-21
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
The style is formal and interrogative, utilizing respectful forms of address (esteemed Chairman of the Session, dear presenter). The speaker poses direct questions aimed at clarifying the political direction and challenging the scientific certainty. A rhetorical question is employed concerning the choice of Estonia's role, which points to a logical rather than emotional approach.
2024-11-13
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session.
The rhetorical style is formal, analytical, and critical, yet it is framed as procedural questions addressed to the chair of the session. The speaker relies on logical arguments and statutory provisions to draw attention to the irregularity. The tone is professional and demanding, requesting the chair to call the matter to order.
2024-11-05
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
The style is formal, whether addressing a waiter or the prime minister. The discourse is logical and data-driven, focusing on rational risk analysis. The tone is serious and emphasizes the critical importance of the outcome of the war in Ukraine for European politics.
2024-10-17
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary sitting
The rhetorical style is formal, analytical, and measured, focusing on logical arguments and legal principles. The speaker begins by posing questions to clarify the background of the draft bill, and later explains their position, emphasizing the independence of the judicial system. They use an explanatory tone to substantiate the necessity of judicial review should new circumstances arise.
2024-10-10
Fifteenth Riigikogu, Fourth sitting, plenary session.
The style is formal and interrogative, respectfully addressing the session chairman and the rapporteur. The tone is concerned and analytical, focusing on logical arguments and the unexpected consequences of the draft bill. The figurative expression "a state of being put in a bind" is used to emphasize the unpleasant dilemma facing entrepreneurs.
2024-09-18
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th sitting, plenary session
The style of discourse is formal and question-driven, directly addressing the minister. The emphasis is placed on logical and procedural analysis, utilizing concrete figures (223,000 cars) and inquiring about the system's readiness. The tone is investigative and skeptical, yet unemotional.
2024-09-17
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The mode of address is formal, respectful, and interrogative, commencing with an expression of gratitude to the esteemed Chancellor of Justice for the substantive presentation. The emphasis is placed on logical and procedural precision, aiming to clarify the hierarchy and role of legal documents.
2024-09-09
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The speech is extremely formal and respectful, deferentially addressing all high officials present (the President, the Prime Minister, Ministers, the Presiding Officer). The tone is serious and solemn, suitable for a ceremonial event (such as the taking of an oath). Institutional and official language is employed.