By Months: Jüri Jaanson

The rhetorical style is highly formal, focusing on facts, legal statutes, and procedural details. The tone is predominantly analytical and informative, especially when presenting the work of the commission. When necessary, sharp yet polite criticism is used regarding violations of procedural rules, referring to this as "machine-gun-like firing of questions."

The style is formal, respectful, and highly analytical, focusing on logical and fact-based questions. The speaker frequently employs rhetorical questions or references specific sources (laws, institutions, scientific claims) to underscore their position or seek clarification. Procedural precision and relevance are prioritized, while emotional appeals are avoided.

The tone is predominantly formal, analytical, and inquisitive, seeking to achieve clarity regarding the background of the explanatory memoranda and draft legislation. It employs logical arguments, referencing constitutional principles and the government’s official positions. In the longer address delivered on October 17, the style shifts, becoming more persuasive and passionate, defending the independence of the judicial system and the necessity of reconsideration.

The rhetorical style is extremely formal and respectful, repeatedly employing the address "Honorable Minister/Chancellor of Justice." The tone is analytical and inquisitive, focusing on logical and procedural details and verifying the feasibility of implementation. Emotional appeals are not used; the emphasis is placed on obtaining explanations and clarifications.