By Months: Jüri Jaanson
Total Months: 12
Fully Profiled: 12
10.2025
6 Speeches
The style of the speech is formal and respectful, beginning with praise for the Minister of Finance regarding his work on drafting the budget and referring to him as a premier politician. The rhetoric is politician-focused and balanced, presenting a measured question about the sustainability of culture and sport alongside the expression of support.
09.2025
6 Speeches
The style is formal and question-oriented, particularly when communicating with the Chancellor of Justice, where a logical and fact-based approach is employed. In the debate, the tone shifts to corrective and defensive, utilizing logical argumentation to refute the opposing side’s derogatory language concerning disabilities. The speaker emphasizes that blindness and deafness do not constitute an impediment.
06.2025
14 Speeches
The style is predominantly formal, analytical, and procedural, especially when dealing with committee reports and communicating with the session chair. He/She presents arguments logically, relying on the ministry's positions, the committee's voting results, and on-the-ground facts. Criticism is directed at political initiatives and the irregularity of procedural rules, not at individuals.
05.2025
2 Speeches
The rhetorical style is formal, analytical, and heavily oriented toward questions, addressing the session chair, the minister, and the presenter with respect. The speaker demands clarity, focusing on logical arguments, scientific definitions, and the practical consequences of the policy, while avoiding emotional appeals.
04.2025
5 Speeches
The rhetorical style is formal and respectful, frequently utilizing the address "Honorable Minister." It favors logical argumentation and requires a comprehensive explanation concerning the technical details and implementation of draft legislation, with particular emphasis placed on the situation preceding and following the enactment of the law. It employs the emotional term "disappointment" in relation to the sports sector being neglected.
03.2025
11 Speeches
The language used is predominantly formal, analytical, and procedural, especially during presentations of draft legislation. The tone focuses on legal clarity, reducing bureaucracy, and defending the bill's objectives. When engaging with opponents (e.g., Isamaa), the style is critical, yet remains argumentative and centers on procedural or substantive inconsistencies.
02.2025
7 Speeches
The rhetorical style is formal, analytical, and interrogative, often posing detailed questions to ministers and presenters. The tone expresses concern regarding security and the safety of movement, yet simultaneously acknowledges the self-realization of athletes, emphasizing the "will to push beyond one's limits." Both logical arguments (statistics, attrition data) and value-based emphases are utilized, such as the supportive function of sport.
01.2025
2 Speeches
The style is formal, respectful, and inquisitive, addressing the session chair, the minister, and the rapporteur with deference. The speaker focuses on seeking clarification and broadening the discussion by posing logical and procedural questions. The tone is analytical and measured, steering clear of emotional appeals.
12.2024
7 Speeches
The rhetorical style is highly formal, focusing on facts, legal statutes, and procedural details. The tone is predominantly analytical and informative, especially when presenting the work of the commission. When necessary, sharp yet polite criticism is used regarding violations of procedural rules, referring to this as "machine-gun-like firing of questions."
11.2024
6 Speeches
The style is formal, respectful, and highly analytical, focusing on logical and fact-based questions. The speaker frequently employs rhetorical questions or references specific sources (laws, institutions, scientific claims) to underscore their position or seek clarification. Procedural precision and relevance are prioritized, while emotional appeals are avoided.
10.2024
7 Speeches
The tone is predominantly formal, analytical, and inquisitive, seeking to achieve clarity regarding the background of the explanatory memoranda and draft legislation. It employs logical arguments, referencing constitutional principles and the government’s official positions. In the longer address delivered on October 17, the style shifts, becoming more persuasive and passionate, defending the independence of the judicial system and the necessity of reconsideration.
09.2024
5 Speeches
The rhetorical style is extremely formal and respectful, repeatedly employing the address "Honorable Minister/Chancellor of Justice." The tone is analytical and inquisitive, focusing on logical and procedural details and verifying the feasibility of implementation. Emotional appeals are not used; the emphasis is placed on obtaining explanations and clarifications.