By Plenary Sessions: Jüri Jaanson

The rhetorical style is formal, analytical, and measured, focusing on logical arguments and legal principles. The speaker begins by posing questions to clarify the background of the draft bill, and later explains their position, emphasizing the independence of the judicial system. They use an explanatory tone to substantiate the necessity of judicial review should new circumstances arise.

The style is formal and interrogative, respectfully addressing the session chairman and the rapporteur. The tone is concerned and analytical, focusing on logical arguments and the unexpected consequences of the draft bill. The figurative expression "a state of being put in a bind" is used to emphasize the unpleasant dilemma facing entrepreneurs.