By Months: Jüri Jaanson

The economic perspective emphasizes budgetary discipline and the efficient use of state resources, raising questions about the coverage of costs for new regulations (up to 100,000 euros) within the state budget. He/She supports reducing bureaucracy, which would result in financial savings for the Environmental Board (approximately 40,000 euros).

The economic outlook is tied to security, stressing that supporting Ukraine is economically rational for European countries, as it avoids costs that could be up to 20 times higher should Russia win. No other domestic positions concerning taxes, the budget, or regulations were presented in the speeches.

There are no direct economic implications. Concerns are being raised that the adoption of the draft law could place entrepreneurs and institutional leaders in an awkward position, forcing them to hire potentially dangerous individuals due to the Equal Treatment Act. This highlights concerns regarding the practical impact of these regulations on employers.

The economic perspective centers on the efficiency of implementing regulations and ensuring citizens are properly informed regarding environmental taxes, thereby preventing unnecessary financial burdens. Furthermore, emphasis is placed on the tight connection between education (micro-degrees) and the needs of the labor market and employers, which is crucial for guaranteeing the successful outcome of investments aimed at skills improvement.