By Agendas: Diana Ingerainen

Demonstrates competence in tax policy, economics, and the effectiveness of social policy. Specific budgetary figures (400–200 million euros) are utilized, and reference is made to the operation of the supply chain (wholesalers, retail chains) absorbing the tax cut. The argument draws upon European experiences and quotes the economist (Mr. Vitsur) regarding the context of "room for maneuver."

The speaker demonstrates expertise regarding the financial capabilities of the European Union's long-term budget and the specific challenges facing the social sector, citing the EU budget's 14% target allocated for social affairs. This professional knowledge is evident in the analysis of the fragmentation of the welfare system, the necessity of accounting for demographic shifts, and the examination of previous failures within the healthcare sector. He/She emphasizes that successful operating models require human-centered solutions, not merely investments in infrastructure.

Insufficient dataset

The speaker demonstrates expertise in the field of tax policy and budget analysis, highlighting specific financial impacts (a 200 million deficit) and referencing analyses conducted by the Ministry of Finance and the Praxis think tank. Particular emphasis is placed on the effect of VAT reduction on final prices, using examples from other countries (Latvia, Finland) where no long-term impact on pricing was observed. The speaker is capable of explaining the price formation chain and the proportion of VAT within that chain.

The speaker demonstrates knowledge concerning the procedures for reviewing state budget planning methodologies and metrics. Specifically, the rapid advancement of technology is highlighted as a factor necessitating the continuous updating of budgetary regulations. Technical terms such as "metrics" and "methodologies" are utilized.

The expertise demonstrated lies in the area of Riigikogu procedural rules and committee work management, particularly within the context of the Finance Committee. The presenter is familiar with the committee's decision-making processes and knows who (the Minister, Tiina Hansson) provided updates on the progress of negotiations. There is a lack of evidence regarding deep technical tax knowledge; the focus is primarily on process management.

Expertise was utilized in the legislative process, particularly concerning the work of the Finance Committee and the handling of the draft bill, defining its scope (up to 19 years old). Gaps in knowledge regarding the bill’s impacts are highlighted, and reference is made to the broader political context, such as the absence of a comprehensive labor policy and the OSKA study. Academic expertise is also mentioned, referencing the analyses of Professor Urmas Varblane.

The speaker demonstrates expertise regarding the strategic financing and resource reassessment of national defense, highlighting the concept of comprehensive national defense. Budgetary and analytical terminology, such as "supplementary budget," "impact assessments," and "performance indicators," is utilized. The core expertise centers on the necessity of directing resources effectively.

The speaker demonstrates interest in comparative law and legislative methodology, inquiring about adopting models from other countries. Specifically, Israel and Finland are mentioned as potential templates for developing solutions within the framework of emergency legislation.

The speaker demonstrates profound expertise in the field of healthcare, particularly regarding ethical considerations, procedures for advance directives, and the integration of the health information system. Separate emphasis is placed on the existence and functioning of palliative care, mentioning specific medical roles (general practitioners, anesthesiologists, palliative care physicians).

The expertise is evident in the area of Riigikogu procedural processes and committee work, as demonstrated by the presentation of accurate voting results and decisions. He/She acts as a representative of the Finance Committee but does not personally present economic or technical data concerning excise duties. He/She refers to colleague Aivar Kokk, who provided an overview of the draft bill, demonstrating the sharing of knowledge within the committee.

Expertise is clearly linked to the legislative procedure and the Riigikogu's rules of procedure, particularly regarding the representation of the principal committee. The speaker is proficient in the procedures for placing bills on the agenda, concluding readings, and setting deadlines for amendments. No substantive budgetary or economic details are presented.

The expert analysis is evident in the area of legislative procedure and fiscal policy, highlighting specific figures regarding the state budget deficit (400 million euros). Reference is also made to technical details, such as the requirement of the EU VAT Directive for a maximum of two reduced tax rates. The expert findings are substantiated by the views of Erle Kõomets, a representative of the Ministry of Finance.

Subject Matter Expertise: Demonstrates proficiency in tax policy and budgetary impacts, drawing upon experts from the Ministry of Finance and the Estonian Institute of Economic Research. It stresses the necessity of studying in greater detail the effect of tax changes on public health and the entire food supply chain in Estonia, citing the experiences of Latvia and other EU member states.

Insufficient data