By Agendas: Diana Ingerainen

The speaker positively refers to the issues raised by other colleagues ("which have already been discussed here") and quotes the economist Mr. Vitsur sympathetically. He identifies opportunities for cooperation in strengthening the role of the Competition Authority in ensuring fair prices and robust competition.

The speaker emphasizes the necessity of cooperation and senses a strong, unified will within the Riigikogu to stand for the nation’s interests, irrespective of shifts in power. He/She commends the competence and dedication of Estonian agencies in safeguarding national interests. Cooperation is deemed critical between healthcare, social welfare, and communities for achieving long-term agreements.

Insufficient data

The collaborative style is open to the inclusion of experts, involving Ministry of Finance officials (Aet Külasalu and Madis Aben) in the commission's work to present analyses. It is noted that the commission reached a consensus on two decisions, indicating a willingness to cooperate on procedural issues.

The style of cooperation is open and inquisitive, directed straight to the Minister with the aim of finding a better solution for updating the budget metrics. The approach is constructive and seeks a procedural solution.

The working style is highly consensus-driven, given that all decisions made by the Finance Committee concerning the draft legislation were adopted unanimously ("by consensus"). The speaker highlighted the cooperation achieved with both colleagues and government representatives (the Minister, Tiina Hansson) during the preparation of the bill.

The style of cooperation is consensual and procedural, noting that the decisions in the Finance Committee regarding the inclusion of the draft bill on the plenary agenda and the appointment of a representative were adopted by consensus. Reference is also made to cooperation or knowledge sharing with the academic community (Professor Urmas Varblane).

The speaker acknowledges that compromises were made during the drafting of the supplementary budget, signaling a readiness for negotiations within the budget process. Colleagues are called upon to support the draft legislation, stressing the shared objective of guaranteeing the security of the state.

The speaker demonstrates a willingness to cooperate by expressing agreement with a previous stance taken by another colleague concerning the delay of the draft law. This suggests a readiness to align with similar critical viewpoints.

The speaker expresses gratitude for the extensive preparation of the draft bill, which points to successful cooperation throughout the legislative process. He/She acts as a spokesperson for the expectations and needs of the medical community, emphasizing that medical circles are eagerly awaiting the passage of this law.

The cooperation style is pragmatic and appreciative, referring to the consensus decisions made within the committee. He positively mentions his colleague Aivar Kokk and emphasizes that two out of the three decisions (placing the item on the agenda and appointing a representative) were adopted unanimously.

The style of cooperation is highly consensual and collegial, emphasizing that all important decisions regarding the handling of the draft bill were made unanimously by the committee. It also demonstrates cooperation with the executive branch, as Finance Minister Jürgen Ligi participated in the session and answered questions.

The style of cooperation is evident within the commission through the consensual adoption of procedural decisions, even though the final political decision was based on a vote (5:2). Also important is the cooperation with the representative of the Ministry of Finance, whose expert opinion was utilized when justifying the rejection of the draft legislation. The speaker emphasizes that they are representing the commission's position, not a personal opinion.

Cooperation style: Cooperative internally within the commission, noting that procedural decisions (e.g., the election of a representative) were made by consensus. Works closely with experts from ministries and institutes and refers to data presented by colleagues (Lauri Laats). Is open to continuing the debate and conducting a more detailed investigation.

Insufficient data