By Plenary Sessions: Lauri Hussar

The style is formal, analytical, and persuasive, focusing on procedural logic and the necessity of legal reform. The speaker utilizes historical data to support arguments and cites external sources, such as a Postimees editorial, to underscore the positive trajectory of the amendments. The tone is measured, yet it strongly emphasizes the imperative to adopt the legislation during the current session.

The rhetorical style is extremely formal, neutral, and procedural, fitting the role of the session chair. Short, clear, and authoritative sentences are used, aimed at advancing the items on the agenda. Emotional or logical appeals are absent; the emphasis is placed on parliamentary language usage ("esteemed rapporteur," "I close the debate").

The style of the address is formal and analytical, heavily employing rhetorical questions to illustrate the extreme interpretation of the session chairman's authority ("cracking the whip"). The tone is investigative, aimed at obtaining a procedural clarification for the official transcript.